Child Protective Services Workers' Decision Making and Risk Management

The role of those who work in child protective services (CPS) is to ensure children's safety and well-being. This study explored eight CPS professionals’ perceptions of risk assessment in child protection cases and their ideas of barriers and facilitators they encountered in their decision-making in the field. Through a force field analysis, using Lewin's change theory, content analysis of narrative data collected using open ended surveys revealed child welfare professionals’ experiences with the driving and restraining forces in child risk assessment. Findings highlighted continuing needs in the areas of training, cultural contexts, and ways for better collaboration and information to manage the pressures of the broader system in which they operate. The findings from the analysis further illuminated the challenges professionals undertake, constantly weighing protective factors against potential threats. This study may contribute to positive social change and further the social determinants of health by providing evidence-based insights to inform policy and practice improvements within CPS and by identifying common elements that influence risk assessment decisions. The findings may aid in the development of targeted training programs that enhance the ability of CPS professionals to detect and respond to risks effectively. This could lead to more precise interventions that protect children and promote their welfare. Further, understanding the systemic pressures and cultural contexts that impact decision-making can lead to organizational changes that better support professionals in their critical roles.

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Published
2024-09-18
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Child Protective Services Workers' Decision Making and Risk Management

ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Child Protective Services Workers' Decision Making and Risk Management

article en

Abstract

The role of those who work in child protective services (CPS) is to ensure children's safety and well-being. This study explored eight CPS professionals’ perceptions of risk assessment in child protection cases and their ideas of barriers and facilitators they encountered in their decision-making in the field. Through a force field analysis, using Lewin's change theory, content analysis of narrative data collected using open ended surveys revealed child welfare professionals’ experiences with the driving and restraining forces in child risk assessment. Findings highlighted continuing needs in the areas of training, cultural contexts, and ways for better collaboration and information to manage the pressures of the broader system in which they operate. The findings from the analysis further illuminated the challenges professionals undertake, constantly weighing protective factors against potential threats. This study may contribute to positive social change and further the social determinants of health by providing evidence-based insights to inform policy and practice improvements within CPS and by identifying common elements that influence risk assessment decisions. The findings may aid in the development of targeted training programs that enhance the ability of CPS professionals to detect and respond to risks effectively. This could lead to more precise interventions that protect children and promote their welfare. Further, understanding the systemic pressures and cultural contexts that impact decision-making can lead to organizational changes that better support professionals in their critical roles.

ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.