Attitudes Toward the Use of AI in Student Assessment

Several studies have been conducted across various academic disciplines to explore the use and effectiveness of generative AI. Scholars have found significant support for AI-based tools in higher education, leading to their integration to enhance student learning outcomes. However, there has been limited exploration of how AI-based tools can be utilized to assess student performance and offer feedback. This study aims to fill this gap by utilizing behavioral approaches to investigate public perceptions regarding using AI-based tools to assess student performance and provide feedback. Additionally, it will assess public perceptions of AI's potential to mitigate human bias in student assessment, a promising aspect of AI in education. The study also aims to understand preferences for human and/or AI-based tools in training learners on specific topics such as leadership, empathy, and human connection. The study aims to understand the essential attributes of AI-based assessment and performance evaluation approaches among college students. With the increasing integration of AI-based tools in various aspects of modern society, there is an urgent need to understand how these tools may influence how learners in higher education perceive their utility in assessing performance and providing personalized feedback. Our research aims to contribute to the ongoing exploration of generative AI, particularly in the area of student assessment and feedback generation, which has not been extensively examined in academic discourse.

Publication Details

Journal
OPUS - Open Portal to University Scholarship (Governors State University)
Published
2025-04-16
Primary Topic
Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitudes Toward the Use of AI in Student Assessment

OPUS - Open Portal to University Scholarship (Governors State University)
Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
article

Attitudes Toward the Use of AI in Student Assessment

article en

Abstract

Several studies have been conducted across various academic disciplines to explore the use and effectiveness of generative AI. Scholars have found significant support for AI-based tools in higher education, leading to their integration to enhance student learning outcomes. However, there has been limited exploration of how AI-based tools can be utilized to assess student performance and offer feedback. This study aims to fill this gap by utilizing behavioral approaches to investigate public perceptions regarding using AI-based tools to assess student performance and provide feedback. Additionally, it will assess public perceptions of AI's potential to mitigate human bias in student assessment, a promising aspect of AI in education. The study also aims to understand preferences for human and/or AI-based tools in training learners on specific topics such as leadership, empathy, and human connection. The study aims to understand the essential attributes of AI-based assessment and performance evaluation approaches among college students. With the increasing integration of AI-based tools in various aspects of modern society, there is an urgent need to understand how these tools may influence how learners in higher education perceive their utility in assessing performance and providing personalized feedback. Our research aims to contribute to the ongoing exploration of generative AI, particularly in the area of student assessment and feedback generation, which has not been extensively examined in academic discourse.

OPUS - Open Portal to University Scholarship (Governors State University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.