AMENDMENT 7 BALLOT CANDY AND THE SINGLE SUBJECT RULE: HOW THE LEGISLATIVE SUPERMAJORITY AMENDED THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO LIMIT VOTER CHOICE

During the most recent general election, Missouri voters passed Amendment 7, a legislative ballot measure which erected bulwarks around an election process that limits voter choice. This article will discuss some of Missouri’s constitutional protections against deceptive ballot provision packages, specifically the single subject rule, as well as why they necessarily fall short of total efficacy. It does not argue for a more stringent application of the rules, because doing so would have implications for one of Missourians’ most powerful tools of direct democracy. The paper will examine Amendment 7 for its use of “ballot candy” that legislators successfully dangled to push unpopular rider provisions past unsuspecting voters and enticed them to undermine their own interests.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AMENDMENT 7 BALLOT CANDY AND THE SINGLE SUBJECT RULE: HOW THE LEGISLATIVE SUPERMAJORITY AMENDED THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO LIMIT VOTER CHOICE

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

AMENDMENT 7 BALLOT CANDY AND THE SINGLE SUBJECT RULE: HOW THE LEGISLATIVE SUPERMAJORITY AMENDED THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO LIMIT VOTER CHOICE

article en

Abstract

During the most recent general election, Missouri voters passed Amendment 7, a legislative ballot measure which erected bulwarks around an election process that limits voter choice. This article will discuss some of Missouri’s constitutional protections against deceptive ballot provision packages, specifically the single subject rule, as well as why they necessarily fall short of total efficacy. It does not argue for a more stringent application of the rules, because doing so would have implications for one of Missourians’ most powerful tools of direct democracy. The paper will examine Amendment 7 for its use of “ballot candy” that legislators successfully dangled to push unpopular rider provisions past unsuspecting voters and enticed them to undermine their own interests.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AMENDMENT 7 BALLOT CANDY AND THE SINGLE SUBJECT RULE: HOW THE LEGISLATIVE SUPERMAJORITY AMENDED THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO LIMIT VOTER CHOICE · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS