Alabama Agricultural Producers’ Experiences with Wild Pigs (<em>Sus scrofa</em>) and Their Preferences Concerning Wild Pig Management

Government agencies and landowners use a variety of lethal methods to reduce invasive wild pig populations and resulting agricultural damages. To provide decision-makers with information regarding Alabama farmers’ experiences with wild pigs and their preferences for management actions, we surveyed Alabama Farmers Federation members in 2020. We found that wild pigs were commonly present on livestock, timber, and crop production acreage, but wild pig damages and costs were much more common among crop producers. Respondents' wildlife acceptance capacity for wild pigs was low and all lethal control methods were considered aceptable by most reposndents, particularly those performed by landowners. While there is likely a consensus among Alabama gfarmers that wild pig numbers need to be reduced within the sate, managers should continue to build support by working a closely with crop producers and by addressing potential concerns regarding the implementation of methods by government agencies in future initiatives and outreach,

Publication Details

Journal
Insecta mundi
Published
2024-11-14
Primary Topic
Particle Detector Development and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alabama Agricultural Producers’ Experiences with Wild Pigs (Sus scrofa) and Their Preferences Concerning Wild Pig Management

Insecta mundi
Particle Detector Development and Performance
article

Alabama Agricultural Producers’ Experiences with Wild Pigs (Sus scrofa) and Their Preferences Concerning Wild Pig Management

article en

Abstract

Government agencies and landowners use a variety of lethal methods to reduce invasive wild pig populations and resulting agricultural damages. To provide decision-makers with information regarding Alabama farmers’ experiences with wild pigs and their preferences for management actions, we surveyed Alabama Farmers Federation members in 2020. We found that wild pigs were commonly present on livestock, timber, and crop production acreage, but wild pig damages and costs were much more common among crop producers. Respondents' wildlife acceptance capacity for wild pigs was low and all lethal control methods were considered aceptable by most reposndents, particularly those performed by landowners. While there is likely a consensus among Alabama gfarmers that wild pig numbers need to be reduced within the sate, managers should continue to build support by working a closely with crop producers and by addressing potential concerns regarding the implementation of methods by government agencies in future initiatives and outreach,

Insecta mundi
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Particle Detector Development and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.