Transforming complex survey data into actionable insights: a data-driven approach for evaluating digital health programmes

This study evaluates engagement and impact across five digital health programmes using a hybrid data analytics approach. Logistic regression revealed that engagement with the digital programmes varied significantly by age, gender, health status, disability, and physical activity levels, with distinct predictors identified for each programme type. BERTopic revealed key user motivations such as information seeking, community support and barriers such as lack of awareness, platform aversion to engagement across the programmes. Sentiment analysis indicated generally positive perceptions but proved limited for in-depth understanding of programme usefulness. Zero-shot classification, leveraging the ‘facebook/bart-large-mnli’ model and the COM-B framework, identified ‘Capability’ and ‘Motivation’ as primary impact categories reported by users. The study underscored the importance of manual refinement to improve interpretability in automated analyses and the context-specific limitations of topic modelling with brief textual responses. Additionally, addressing missing data and imbalanced categorical variables was critical for maintaining analytical integrity. Future research should explore automated refinement techniques and employ mixed methods designs to enhance understanding of programmes effectiveness and user engagement.

Publication Details

Journal
London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Published
2025-04-21
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transforming complex survey data into actionable insights: a data-driven approach for evaluating digital health programmes

London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Transforming complex survey data into actionable insights: a data-driven approach for evaluating digital health programmes

article en

Abstract

This study evaluates engagement and impact across five digital health programmes using a hybrid data analytics approach. Logistic regression revealed that engagement with the digital programmes varied significantly by age, gender, health status, disability, and physical activity levels, with distinct predictors identified for each programme type. BERTopic revealed key user motivations such as information seeking, community support and barriers such as lack of awareness, platform aversion to engagement across the programmes. Sentiment analysis indicated generally positive perceptions but proved limited for in-depth understanding of programme usefulness. Zero-shot classification, leveraging the ‘facebook/bart-large-mnli’ model and the COM-B framework, identified ‘Capability’ and ‘Motivation’ as primary impact categories reported by users. The study underscored the importance of manual refinement to improve interpretability in automated analyses and the context-specific limitations of topic modelling with brief textual responses. Additionally, addressing missing data and imbalanced categorical variables was critical for maintaining analytical integrity. Future research should explore automated refinement techniques and employ mixed methods designs to enhance understanding of programmes effectiveness and user engagement.

London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.