An Updated Systematic Review on Asthma Exacerbation Risk Prediction Models Between 2017 and 2023: Risk of Bias and Applicability

Anqi Liu, Yue Zhang, Chandra Prakash Yadav, Wenjia Chen Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, SingaporeCorrespondence: Wenjia Chen, Tahir Foundation Building, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore, 117549, Email [email protected]: Accurate risk prediction of exacerbations in asthma patients promotes personalized asthma management.Objective: This systematic review aimed to provide an update and critically appraise the quality and usability of asthma exacerbation prediction models which were developed since 2017.Methods: In the Embase and PubMed databases, we performed a systematic search for studies published in English between May 2017 and August 2023, and identified peer-reviewed publications regarding the development of prognostic prediction models for the risk of asthma exacerbations in adult patients with asthma. We then applied the Prediction Risk of Bias Assessment tool (PROBAST) to assess the risk of bias and applicability of the included models.Results: Of 415 studies screened, 10 met eligibility criteria, comprising 41 prediction models. Among them, 7 (70%) studies used real-world data (RWD) and 3 (30%) were based on trial data to derive the models, 7 (70%) studies applied machine learning algorithms, and 2 (20%) studies included biomarkers like blood eosinophil count and fractional exhaled nitric oxide in the model. PROBAST indicated a generally high risk of bias (80%) in these models, which mainly originated from the sample selection (“Participant” domain, 6 studies) and statistical analysis (“Analysis” domain, 7 studies). Meanwhile, 5 (50%) studies were rated as having a high concern in applicability due to model complexity.Conclusion: Despite the use of big health data and advanced ML, asthma risk prediction models from 2017– 2023 had high risk of bias and limited practical use. Future efforts should enhance generalizability and practicality for real-world implementation.Keywords: adults, asthma, exacerbation, prediction model, risk

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Updated Systematic Review on Asthma Exacerbation Risk Prediction Models Between 2017 and 2023: Risk of Bias and Applicability

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

An Updated Systematic Review on Asthma Exacerbation Risk Prediction Models Between 2017 and 2023: Risk of Bias and Applicability

article en

Abstract

Anqi Liu, Yue Zhang, Chandra Prakash Yadav, Wenjia Chen Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, SingaporeCorrespondence: Wenjia Chen, Tahir Foundation Building, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore, 117549, Email [email protected]: Accurate risk prediction of exacerbations in asthma patients promotes personalized asthma management.Objective: This systematic review aimed to provide an update and critically appraise the quality and usability of asthma exacerbation prediction models which were developed since 2017.Methods: In the Embase and PubMed databases, we performed a systematic search for studies published in English between May 2017 and August 2023, and identified peer-reviewed publications regarding the development of prognostic prediction models for the risk of asthma exacerbations in adult patients with asthma. We then applied the Prediction Risk of Bias Assessment tool (PROBAST) to assess the risk of bias and applicability of the included models.Results: Of 415 studies screened, 10 met eligibility criteria, comprising 41 prediction models. Among them, 7 (70%) studies used real-world data (RWD) and 3 (30%) were based on trial data to derive the models, 7 (70%) studies applied machine learning algorithms, and 2 (20%) studies included biomarkers like blood eosinophil count and fractional exhaled nitric oxide in the model. PROBAST indicated a generally high risk of bias (80%) in these models, which mainly originated from the sample selection (“Participant” domain, 6 studies) and statistical analysis (“Analysis” domain, 7 studies). Meanwhile, 5 (50%) studies were rated as having a high concern in applicability due to model complexity.Conclusion: Despite the use of big health data and advanced ML, asthma risk prediction models from 2017– 2023 had high risk of bias and limited practical use. Future efforts should enhance generalizability and practicality for real-world implementation.Keywords: adults, asthma, exacerbation, prediction model, risk

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.