The scholion on Dionysios of Thrace (183.1 Hilgard) and the origins of the Greek alphabet

<p> The article deals with a <em>scholion </em>on Dionysios of Thrace (<em>Scholia in Dionysii Thracis artem grammaticam</em> 183.15–19, 183.27–29, 184.1–15, <em>Grammatici Graeci</em> 3 Hilgard) which summarises the various traditions on the inventor of the alphabet. The passage is a noteworthy case-study which highlights the value of the analysis of texts which ancient historians might deem too recent. This paper shows that the <em>scholion</em> is helpful for understanding the importance which the discussion on the origins of the alphabet had for the Greeks of the fifth century BC. Finally, it will explain why the debate about the inventor of the letters orbited around two characters – Cadmus and Danaos – and, consequently, around two different regions, Phoenicia and Egypt. It will conclude that the choice of one version rather than another was strongly influenced by political and cultural motivations. </p>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-30
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The scholion on Dionysios of Thrace (183.1 Hilgard) and the origins of the Greek alphabet

Figshare
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

The scholion on Dionysios of Thrace (183.1 Hilgard) and the origins of the Greek alphabet

article en

Abstract

<p> The article deals with a <em>scholion </em>on Dionysios of Thrace (<em>Scholia in Dionysii Thracis artem grammaticam</em> 183.15–19, 183.27–29, 184.1–15, <em>Grammatici Graeci</em> 3 Hilgard) which summarises the various traditions on the inventor of the alphabet. The passage is a noteworthy case-study which highlights the value of the analysis of texts which ancient historians might deem too recent. This paper shows that the <em>scholion</em> is helpful for understanding the importance which the discussion on the origins of the alphabet had for the Greeks of the fifth century BC. Finally, it will explain why the debate about the inventor of the letters orbited around two characters – Cadmus and Danaos – and, consequently, around two different regions, Phoenicia and Egypt. It will conclude that the choice of one version rather than another was strongly influenced by political and cultural motivations. </p>

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.