Pushing Methodological Boundaries: Using the Extended Case Study Method to Explore Parental Decision-Making in Pediatric Clinical Trials

This paper aims to illustrate the application of the Extended Case Study Method (ECSM) as advanced by Michael Buroway (1998), in a research context characterized by high sensitivity and complexity: parental decision-making regarding the participation of their seriously ill children in clinical trials. Research in this area is inherently difficult due to the emotional and ethical challenges involved, the vulnerability of the participants, and the confidentiality required for both medical and personal data. Traditional approaches, such as standard case studies or ethnographies, may struggle to provide the depth of insight necessary to fully understand the nuanced factors influencing parental decisions in such sensitive circumstances. To address these challenges, ECSM was employed to extend researcher’s position from the observer to the participant, allowing for a deeper engagement with the parents' experiences and decision-making processes. The method also facilitated the exploration of broader social and institutional forces that shape and constrain these decisions, showing how the element of trust becomes the significant factor influencing decision to participate, while religion and race are embedded in this context. By integrating Symbolic Interactionism theory and the Principle of Autonomy, the study extends theoretical understanding, linking individual parental choices to larger systemic influences. This article demonstrates how ECSM can be effectively operationalized in such a difficult research setting, offering a framework for gaining indepth insights while upholding the ethical and practical constraints inherent in the study. The findings highlight the value of ECSM in capturing the complexity of decision-making processes within sensitive research domains, providing a methodological approach that balances rigor with respect for participant confidentiality and emotional well-being

Publication Details

Journal
Universiti Utara Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Utara Malaysia)
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pushing Methodological Boundaries: Using the Extended Case Study Method to Explore Parental Decision-Making in Pediatric Clinical Trials

Universiti Utara Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Utara Malaysia)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Pushing Methodological Boundaries: Using the Extended Case Study Method to Explore Parental Decision-Making in Pediatric Clinical Trials

article en

Abstract

This paper aims to illustrate the application of the Extended Case Study Method (ECSM) as advanced by Michael Buroway (1998), in a research context characterized by high sensitivity and complexity: parental decision-making regarding the participation of their seriously ill children in clinical trials. Research in this area is inherently difficult due to the emotional and ethical challenges involved, the vulnerability of the participants, and the confidentiality required for both medical and personal data. Traditional approaches, such as standard case studies or ethnographies, may struggle to provide the depth of insight necessary to fully understand the nuanced factors influencing parental decisions in such sensitive circumstances. To address these challenges, ECSM was employed to extend researcher’s position from the observer to the participant, allowing for a deeper engagement with the parents' experiences and decision-making processes. The method also facilitated the exploration of broader social and institutional forces that shape and constrain these decisions, showing how the element of trust becomes the significant factor influencing decision to participate, while religion and race are embedded in this context. By integrating Symbolic Interactionism theory and the Principle of Autonomy, the study extends theoretical understanding, linking individual parental choices to larger systemic influences. This article demonstrates how ECSM can be effectively operationalized in such a difficult research setting, offering a framework for gaining indepth insights while upholding the ethical and practical constraints inherent in the study. The findings highlight the value of ECSM in capturing the complexity of decision-making processes within sensitive research domains, providing a methodological approach that balances rigor with respect for participant confidentiality and emotional well-being

Universiti Utara Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Utara Malaysia)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pushing Methodological Boundaries: Using the Extended Case Study Method to Explore Parental Decision-Making in Pediatric Clinical Trials · Universiti Utara Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Utara Malaysia) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS