The Politics of Perspective: A Comparative Analysis of the Framing of Political Violence in German Media Coverage of Immigration Prior to the 2024 State Elections

This study examines the role of German media in framing politically motivated violence and immigration in the lead-up to the 2024 state elections, focusing on three outlets: Thüringer Allgemeine, Die Zeit, and TAZ. Through comparative content analysis of coverage on key incidents, the research highlights how political leanings and editorial choices shape public discourse and influence societal attitudes. Findings reveal stark contrasts in local and national reporting, with local outlets reinforcing confirmation biases and national outlets offering broader narratives. The analysis underscores the critical impact of framing, from emotional appeals to policy-oriented discourse, on public perception and political outcomes. This study contributes to understanding the media's role in democratic societies and calls for heightened media literacy to combat polarization and misinformation in an increasingly contentious political landscape.

Publication Details

Journal
DigitalResearch@Fordham (Fordham University)
Published
2025-05-17
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Perspective: A Comparative Analysis of the Framing of Political Violence in German Media Coverage of Immigration Prior to the 2024 State Elections

DigitalResearch@Fordham (Fordham University)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

The Politics of Perspective: A Comparative Analysis of the Framing of Political Violence in German Media Coverage of Immigration Prior to the 2024 State Elections

article en

Abstract

This study examines the role of German media in framing politically motivated violence and immigration in the lead-up to the 2024 state elections, focusing on three outlets: Thüringer Allgemeine, Die Zeit, and TAZ. Through comparative content analysis of coverage on key incidents, the research highlights how political leanings and editorial choices shape public discourse and influence societal attitudes. Findings reveal stark contrasts in local and national reporting, with local outlets reinforcing confirmation biases and national outlets offering broader narratives. The analysis underscores the critical impact of framing, from emotional appeals to policy-oriented discourse, on public perception and political outcomes. This study contributes to understanding the media's role in democratic societies and calls for heightened media literacy to combat polarization and misinformation in an increasingly contentious political landscape.

DigitalResearch@Fordham (Fordham University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.