Psychologists’ Diagnostic Decision Making in ADHD and Autism in Children

The decision-making experiences of psychologists who diagnose children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and high-functioning autism referred to as autism spectrum disorder - level 1 (ASD-1) when symptoms of either one or both are present in children were explored in this hermeneutic phenomenological study. These two common neurodevelopmental disorders share characteristics and symptoms that could lead to diagnostic confusion. There has been an absence of research on psychologists’ experiences with diagnostic decision making since the publications of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5. Exploration of psychologists’ diagnostic decision-making processes can aid in providing early intervention and accurate treatments. The purpose of this study was to bridge the gap in literature related to how psychologists approach diagnosis when making decisions associated with ADHD, ASD, or both as they occur comorbidly. A semi-structured interview protocol was used with seven participants who were asked to reflect upon their diagnostic decision-making processes when evaluating children for ADHD and ASD-1. An interpretive phenomenological approach was used to identify the themes that emerged from the interviews and concepts that provided meaning to the experience of psychologists as decision makers. The findings from this study may provide a foundation for bringing about a positive social change within the mental health field, since it pertains to the diagnostic processes employed to identify ADHD, ASD-1, or both as they occur comorbidly. Understanding how the psychologists approached this led to understanding that each chose what they were most comfortable with based on each individuals training.

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Published
2024-12-02
Primary Topic
Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychologists’ Diagnostic Decision Making in ADHD and Autism in Children

ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
article

Psychologists’ Diagnostic Decision Making in ADHD and Autism in Children

article en

Abstract

The decision-making experiences of psychologists who diagnose children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and high-functioning autism referred to as autism spectrum disorder - level 1 (ASD-1) when symptoms of either one or both are present in children were explored in this hermeneutic phenomenological study. These two common neurodevelopmental disorders share characteristics and symptoms that could lead to diagnostic confusion. There has been an absence of research on psychologists’ experiences with diagnostic decision making since the publications of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5. Exploration of psychologists’ diagnostic decision-making processes can aid in providing early intervention and accurate treatments. The purpose of this study was to bridge the gap in literature related to how psychologists approach diagnosis when making decisions associated with ADHD, ASD, or both as they occur comorbidly. A semi-structured interview protocol was used with seven participants who were asked to reflect upon their diagnostic decision-making processes when evaluating children for ADHD and ASD-1. An interpretive phenomenological approach was used to identify the themes that emerged from the interviews and concepts that provided meaning to the experience of psychologists as decision makers. The findings from this study may provide a foundation for bringing about a positive social change within the mental health field, since it pertains to the diagnostic processes employed to identify ADHD, ASD-1, or both as they occur comorbidly. Understanding how the psychologists approached this led to understanding that each chose what they were most comfortable with based on each individuals training.

ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.