Excluded but Equal

Work law is excessively exclusionary. Canonical examples include agriculture workers, independent contractors, and domestic workers. But work law excludes far more workers and employers than those familiar categories. Whole sectors, occupations, business sizes, wage arrangements, geographical areas, and more are excluded from the basic tenets of economic citizenship, including federal, state, and local minimum wage; overtime; and safety and labor protection laws. Equal protection claims govern the authority of legislatures to determine who is in and who is out of work laws. Excluded workers and included employers now routinely use state and federal constitutional equal protection arguments against exclusionary work laws. Such claims, fail or succeed, tie the contours of equal protection doctrine with the jagged border lines of work law. By describing the effects of equal protection doctrine on work law’s exclusions, this Article offers a path for bending the arc of equal protection doctrine toward inclusion. Doctrinal and institutional changes to how equal protection is administered can create small-scale and radical inclusive shifts in work law writ large.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Excluded but Equal

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Excluded but Equal

article en

Abstract

Work law is excessively exclusionary. Canonical examples include agriculture workers, independent contractors, and domestic workers. But work law excludes far more workers and employers than those familiar categories. Whole sectors, occupations, business sizes, wage arrangements, geographical areas, and more are excluded from the basic tenets of economic citizenship, including federal, state, and local minimum wage; overtime; and safety and labor protection laws. Equal protection claims govern the authority of legislatures to determine who is in and who is out of work laws. Excluded workers and included employers now routinely use state and federal constitutional equal protection arguments against exclusionary work laws. Such claims, fail or succeed, tie the contours of equal protection doctrine with the jagged border lines of work law. By describing the effects of equal protection doctrine on work law’s exclusions, this Article offers a path for bending the arc of equal protection doctrine toward inclusion. Doctrinal and institutional changes to how equal protection is administered can create small-scale and radical inclusive shifts in work law writ large.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.