National Pre-Authorisation Schemes and the EU's Demands for Objectivity Safeguards – Allowing Policy Discretion while Streamlining Administrative Process

The chapter focuses on how process is reviewed in the general framework of EU legal analysis applicable to national pre-authorisation schemes. By examining the model of judicial review developed by the Court of Justice in this regard, I hope to enrich the discussion on what process federalism within the Union can look like and how it may function. After some brief explanations regarding the characteristics of national pre-authorisation schemes, focus is on the role of judicial review where legitimate national interests may justify precautionary regulation, both in regard to the authorisation scheme itself and to the administrative decisions adopted within such a scheme - and how this is handled within the special federal context of the EU, where deference may be owed on more levels than within a single unitary legal system, but where the need to secure the rule of (EU) law seems all the greater.

Publication Details

Journal
Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Published
2024-11-12
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National Pre-Authorisation Schemes and the EU's Demands for Objectivity Safeguards – Allowing Policy Discretion while Streamlining Administrative Process

Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

National Pre-Authorisation Schemes and the EU's Demands for Objectivity Safeguards – Allowing Policy Discretion while Streamlining Administrative Process

article en

Abstract

The chapter focuses on how process is reviewed in the general framework of EU legal analysis applicable to national pre-authorisation schemes. By examining the model of judicial review developed by the Court of Justice in this regard, I hope to enrich the discussion on what process federalism within the Union can look like and how it may function. After some brief explanations regarding the characteristics of national pre-authorisation schemes, focus is on the role of judicial review where legitimate national interests may justify precautionary regulation, both in regard to the authorisation scheme itself and to the administrative decisions adopted within such a scheme - and how this is handled within the special federal context of the EU, where deference may be owed on more levels than within a single unitary legal system, but where the need to secure the rule of (EU) law seems all the greater.

Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.