A Nomogram Based on a Non-Invasive Method to Distinguish Between Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections of Liver Abscess

Haoran Li,1 Xi Chen,2 Hui Feng,1 Fangyi Liu,3 Jie Yu,1 Ping Liang1 1Department of Ultrasound, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Ultrasound, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jie Yu; Ping Liang, Department of Ultrasound, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: The diagnosis of liver abscess (LA) caused by Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) and Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) depends on ultrasonography, but it is difficult to distinguish the overlapping features. Valuable ultrasonic (US) features were extracted to distinguish GPB-LA and GNB-LA and establish the relevant prediction model.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed seven clinical features, three laboratory indicators and 11 US features of consecutive patients with LA from April 2013 to December 2023. Patients with LA were randomly divided into training group (n=262) and validation group (n=174) according to a ratio of 6:4. Univariate logistic regression and LASSO regression were used to establish prediction models. The performance of the model was evaluated using area under the curve(AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA), and subsequently validated in the validation group.Results: A total of 436 participants (median age: 55 years; range: 42– 68 years; 144 women) were evaluated, including 369 participants with GNB-LA and 67 with GPB-LA, respectively. A total of 11 predictors by LASSO regression analysis, which included gender, age, the liver background, internal gas bubble, echogenic debris, wall thickening, whether the inner wall is worm-eaten, temperature, diabetes mellitus, hepatobiliary surgery and neutrophil(NEUT). The performance of the Nomogram prediction model distinguished between GNB-LA and GPB-LA was 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.73– 0.87). In the validation group, the AUC of GNB was 0.79, 95% CI (0.69– 0.89).Conclusion: A model for predicting the risk of GPB-LA was established to help diagnose pathogenic organism of LA earlier, which could help select sensitive antibiotics before the results of drug-sensitive culture available, thereby shorten the treatment time of patients.Keywords: liver abscess, Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, ultrasonography features, prediction model

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-09-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Nomogram Based on a Non-Invasive Method to Distinguish Between Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections of Liver Abscess

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

A Nomogram Based on a Non-Invasive Method to Distinguish Between Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections of Liver Abscess

article en

Abstract

Haoran Li,1 Xi Chen,2 Hui Feng,1 Fangyi Liu,3 Jie Yu,1 Ping Liang1 1Department of Ultrasound, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Ultrasound, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jie Yu; Ping Liang, Department of Ultrasound, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: The diagnosis of liver abscess (LA) caused by Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) and Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) depends on ultrasonography, but it is difficult to distinguish the overlapping features. Valuable ultrasonic (US) features were extracted to distinguish GPB-LA and GNB-LA and establish the relevant prediction model.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed seven clinical features, three laboratory indicators and 11 US features of consecutive patients with LA from April 2013 to December 2023. Patients with LA were randomly divided into training group (n=262) and validation group (n=174) according to a ratio of 6:4. Univariate logistic regression and LASSO regression were used to establish prediction models. The performance of the model was evaluated using area under the curve(AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA), and subsequently validated in the validation group.Results: A total of 436 participants (median age: 55 years; range: 42– 68 years; 144 women) were evaluated, including 369 participants with GNB-LA and 67 with GPB-LA, respectively. A total of 11 predictors by LASSO regression analysis, which included gender, age, the liver background, internal gas bubble, echogenic debris, wall thickening, whether the inner wall is worm-eaten, temperature, diabetes mellitus, hepatobiliary surgery and neutrophil(NEUT). The performance of the Nomogram prediction model distinguished between GNB-LA and GPB-LA was 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.73– 0.87). In the validation group, the AUC of GNB was 0.79, 95% CI (0.69– 0.89).Conclusion: A model for predicting the risk of GPB-LA was established to help diagnose pathogenic organism of LA earlier, which could help select sensitive antibiotics before the results of drug-sensitive culture available, thereby shorten the treatment time of patients.Keywords: liver abscess, Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, ultrasonography features, prediction model

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.