Mental Health Courts: an Assessment of Eligibility Criteria, Service Characteristics, and Public Opinion

Mental health courts, a type of specialty court targeting justice-involved persons with mental illness, have become prominent across the United States. Using a therapeutic jurisprudence approach, these courts largely operate independently with no guiding framework, leading to varied practices. Additionally, public opinion on mental health courts is unknown, causing potential problems as these courts are rapidly expanding and funded, at least partially, through taxpayer dollars. Chapter One of this dissertation provides a framework for the remainder of the dissertation. Chapter Two is a detailed literature review of relevant theories and past research regarding mental health courts. Chapters Three and Four of this dissertation aim to assess practices across mental health courts through a nationally administered mental health court census. Chapter Five assesses public opinion through a nationally representative vignette survey administered through YouGov. Chapter Six concludes this dissertation.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Published
2025-04-30
Primary Topic
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental Health Courts: an Assessment of Eligibility Criteria, Service Characteristics, and Public Opinion

Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
article

Mental Health Courts: an Assessment of Eligibility Criteria, Service Characteristics, and Public Opinion

article en

Abstract

Mental health courts, a type of specialty court targeting justice-involved persons with mental illness, have become prominent across the United States. Using a therapeutic jurisprudence approach, these courts largely operate independently with no guiding framework, leading to varied practices. Additionally, public opinion on mental health courts is unknown, causing potential problems as these courts are rapidly expanding and funded, at least partially, through taxpayer dollars. Chapter One of this dissertation provides a framework for the remainder of the dissertation. Chapter Two is a detailed literature review of relevant theories and past research regarding mental health courts. Chapters Three and Four of this dissertation aim to assess practices across mental health courts through a nationally administered mental health court census. Chapter Five assesses public opinion through a nationally representative vignette survey administered through YouGov. Chapter Six concludes this dissertation.

Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.