The Naturalness and Structure of Relations

This dissertation contributes to a theory of naturalness of properties and relations and to a view on the internal structure of relations. On naturalness, I develop and defend a new theory according to which it is position-relative and category-relative. Relations have object-positions. For example, the loving relation has the lover-position and the beloved-position, and the set-member relation has the set-position and the member-position. Position-relativism allows for attributions of naturalness to positions of relations. Category-relativism allows for attributions of naturalness to properties and (positions of) relations relative to categories of objects. For example, the lover-position of the loving relation can be more natural than its beloved-position, and the set-position of set-membership can be natural relative to the category of sets while failing to be natural relative to the category of physical objects. In the first two papers of this dissertation, I argue that position- and category-relative naturalness can help in accounts of similarity, especially regarding existential derivatives of relations (such as perhaps loving something) and negative totality properties (such as perhaps having no members); that it can help in accounts of intrinsicality, real change, and haecceistic properties; that it can account for negation as privation and real category mistakes; that it entails a distinction between characterizing and non-characterizing fundamental facts; and that it generates multiple orderings of naturalness, which, I suggest, has further applications. In the third paper, I apply a version of this view to improve sparse modalism, the view that analyzes concepts of essence in terms of necessity and naturalness. In the fourth paper, I defend positionalism, the view that takes positions to be irreducible aspects of the internal structure of non-directed relations. I formulate two main versions of this view and argue that they can accommodate relations with any symmetries.

Publication Details

Journal
Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University)
Published
2024-12-20
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Naturalness and Structure of Relations

Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

The Naturalness and Structure of Relations

article en

Abstract

This dissertation contributes to a theory of naturalness of properties and relations and to a view on the internal structure of relations. On naturalness, I develop and defend a new theory according to which it is position-relative and category-relative. Relations have object-positions. For example, the loving relation has the lover-position and the beloved-position, and the set-member relation has the set-position and the member-position. Position-relativism allows for attributions of naturalness to positions of relations. Category-relativism allows for attributions of naturalness to properties and (positions of) relations relative to categories of objects. For example, the lover-position of the loving relation can be more natural than its beloved-position, and the set-position of set-membership can be natural relative to the category of sets while failing to be natural relative to the category of physical objects. In the first two papers of this dissertation, I argue that position- and category-relative naturalness can help in accounts of similarity, especially regarding existential derivatives of relations (such as perhaps loving something) and negative totality properties (such as perhaps having no members); that it can help in accounts of intrinsicality, real change, and haecceistic properties; that it can account for negation as privation and real category mistakes; that it entails a distinction between characterizing and non-characterizing fundamental facts; and that it generates multiple orderings of naturalness, which, I suggest, has further applications. In the third paper, I apply a version of this view to improve sparse modalism, the view that analyzes concepts of essence in terms of necessity and naturalness. In the fourth paper, I defend positionalism, the view that takes positions to be irreducible aspects of the internal structure of non-directed relations. I formulate two main versions of this view and argue that they can accommodate relations with any symmetries.

Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.