Mattress Money: How Civil Forfeiture Leaves Taxpayers with Few Options

Civil forfeiture is a legal practice that allows law enforcement agencies to seize property without a criminal conviction, or even charges. This article examines the tax consequences of civil asset forfeiture, particularly the near-impossibility of individuals or businesses to claim a deduction for forfeited property. By analyzing the treatment of seized and forfeited property by the Internal Revenue Code and related I.R.S. regulations and publications, this study exposes critical gaps in the current system that prevent taxpayers from recognizing losses from civil forfeiture. The article further explores the interaction of tax law and civil forfeiture proceedings, demonstrating how innocent property owners can both be relieved of their property and denied meaningful tax relief. By proposing an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code, this article offers a targeted solution. Ultimately, this study argues for legislative reform that would provide taxpayers a mechanism to account for losses from civil asset forfeiture or regulate the practice further.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-09-02
Primary Topic
Pulsed Power Technology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mattress Money: How Civil Forfeiture Leaves Taxpayers with Few Options

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Pulsed Power Technology Applications
article

Mattress Money: How Civil Forfeiture Leaves Taxpayers with Few Options

article en

Abstract

Civil forfeiture is a legal practice that allows law enforcement agencies to seize property without a criminal conviction, or even charges. This article examines the tax consequences of civil asset forfeiture, particularly the near-impossibility of individuals or businesses to claim a deduction for forfeited property. By analyzing the treatment of seized and forfeited property by the Internal Revenue Code and related I.R.S. regulations and publications, this study exposes critical gaps in the current system that prevent taxpayers from recognizing losses from civil forfeiture. The article further explores the interaction of tax law and civil forfeiture proceedings, demonstrating how innocent property owners can both be relieved of their property and denied meaningful tax relief. By proposing an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code, this article offers a targeted solution. Ultimately, this study argues for legislative reform that would provide taxpayers a mechanism to account for losses from civil asset forfeiture or regulate the practice further.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Pulsed Power Technology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mattress Money: How Civil Forfeiture Leaves Taxpayers with Few Options · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS