The Limits of Climate Change Litigation in the European Court of Human Rights

In KlimaSeniorinnen, the ECtHR opened the door to climate change litigation under the ECHR. How far will the Court go in imposing obligations on states to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change in the many future cases inevitably to come? I identify four limits on the Court’s ambitions in future climate change cases. I argue that these four limits are deeply grounded in the Court’s pre-existing environmental jurisprudence and are congruent with the judgment in KlimaSeniorinnen. They represent red lines that the Court will not cross in future climate change judgments if it wants to maintain coherence with its wider environmental jurisprudence going forward. Respecting these four limits will help the Court to avoid backlash and to protect its perceived legitimacy.

Publication Details

Journal
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Published
2025-12-31
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Limits of Climate Change Litigation in the European Court of Human Rights

Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

The Limits of Climate Change Litigation in the European Court of Human Rights

article en

Abstract

In KlimaSeniorinnen, the ECtHR opened the door to climate change litigation under the ECHR. How far will the Court go in imposing obligations on states to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change in the many future cases inevitably to come? I identify four limits on the Court’s ambitions in future climate change cases. I argue that these four limits are deeply grounded in the Court’s pre-existing environmental jurisprudence and are congruent with the judgment in KlimaSeniorinnen. They represent red lines that the Court will not cross in future climate change judgments if it wants to maintain coherence with its wider environmental jurisprudence going forward. Respecting these four limits will help the Court to avoid backlash and to protect its perceived legitimacy.

Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Limits of Climate Change Litigation in the European Court of Human Rights · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS