Is Digital Technology Distinct from Information Technology? A Pragmatic, Strategic Approach to “Digital” Labeling and Theorizing

This paper is a provocation. It points out the concerning trend of framing digital technology as if it is distinct from information technology. While this practice has positive effects (such as conveying relevancy to external stakeholders), it also builds up and generates detrimental externalities, which have gone largely unnoticed—or at least, not brought up to open forums. The key detriments include (1) a hampered cumulative tradition in the IS discipline and (2) the amorphous, ephemeral value we mistakenly create and project about IS studies and majors—especially in this hyper-competitive educational environment. We, IS scholars (young or seasoned), must be cognizant of these harmful externalities and try to minimize them while utilizing the positive ones. This research commentary contributes to the embryonic collective effort by proposing a set of strategic acts rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Digital Technology Distinct from Information Technology? A Pragmatic, Strategic Approach to “Digital” Labeling and Theorizing

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Is Digital Technology Distinct from Information Technology? A Pragmatic, Strategic Approach to “Digital” Labeling and Theorizing

article en

Abstract

This paper is a provocation. It points out the concerning trend of framing digital technology as if it is distinct from information technology. While this practice has positive effects (such as conveying relevancy to external stakeholders), it also builds up and generates detrimental externalities, which have gone largely unnoticed—or at least, not brought up to open forums. The key detriments include (1) a hampered cumulative tradition in the IS discipline and (2) the amorphous, ephemeral value we mistakenly create and project about IS studies and majors—especially in this hyper-competitive educational environment. We, IS scholars (young or seasoned), must be cognizant of these harmful externalities and try to minimize them while utilizing the positive ones. This research commentary contributes to the embryonic collective effort by proposing a set of strategic acts rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.