Is Occlusion the Solution? REBOA as a Hemorrhage Control Adjunct

Sarah K Lee,1 Kaushik Mukherjee2 1Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California Irvine Health, Irvine, CA, USA; 2Division of Acute Care Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USACorrespondence: Kaushik Mukherjee, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, 11175 Campus Street, CP, 21111, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA, Tel +001 909-558-4286, Fax +001 909-558-236, Email [email protected]: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a promising intervention for hemorrhagic shock and traumatic injury management, offering a minimally invasive means of aortic occlusion compared to resuscitative thoracotomy. While REBOA’s origin dates back to the 1950s, recent advancements have made it more accessible and applicable in various clinical scenarios. REBOA has become increasingly utilized in not only the exsanguinating trauma patient but also in non-traumatic hemorrhage as a bridge to definitive hemostatic control. This article reviews the procedure and mechanism, clinical applications, and challenges associated with the REBOA. There are several challenges to consider when implementing the REBOA, particularly in procedural execution and patient selection. Determining the ideal candidates for REBOA remains inconclusive, with varying outcomes reported in different patient populations. Additionally, the potential for ischemic complications, such as visceral organ injury, end organ damage, and lower extremity ischemia, underscores the critical importance of procedural planning and ongoing monitoring. Partial and intermittent REBOA techniques have been introduced to mitigate ischemic complications associated with complete occlusion, but their efficacy and safety warrant further investigation. Beyond technical considerations, logistical and institutional factors pose as potential barriers to the effective utilization of REBOA, highlighting the importance of standardized training and a multidisciplinary approach when establishing a REBOA program. REBOA offers promising advancements in hemorrhage control, and the technology continues to evolve to address potential challenges and complications. Further research is imperative to delineate its optimal use and potential impact on patient outcomes.Keywords: traumatic hemorrhagic shock, REBOA, postpartum hemorrhage, partial REBOA, aortic occlusion, endovascular

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Occlusion the Solution? REBOA as a Hemorrhage Control Adjunct

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Is Occlusion the Solution? REBOA as a Hemorrhage Control Adjunct

article en

Abstract

Sarah K Lee,1 Kaushik Mukherjee2 1Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California Irvine Health, Irvine, CA, USA; 2Division of Acute Care Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USACorrespondence: Kaushik Mukherjee, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, 11175 Campus Street, CP, 21111, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA, Tel +001 909-558-4286, Fax +001 909-558-236, Email [email protected]: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a promising intervention for hemorrhagic shock and traumatic injury management, offering a minimally invasive means of aortic occlusion compared to resuscitative thoracotomy. While REBOA’s origin dates back to the 1950s, recent advancements have made it more accessible and applicable in various clinical scenarios. REBOA has become increasingly utilized in not only the exsanguinating trauma patient but also in non-traumatic hemorrhage as a bridge to definitive hemostatic control. This article reviews the procedure and mechanism, clinical applications, and challenges associated with the REBOA. There are several challenges to consider when implementing the REBOA, particularly in procedural execution and patient selection. Determining the ideal candidates for REBOA remains inconclusive, with varying outcomes reported in different patient populations. Additionally, the potential for ischemic complications, such as visceral organ injury, end organ damage, and lower extremity ischemia, underscores the critical importance of procedural planning and ongoing monitoring. Partial and intermittent REBOA techniques have been introduced to mitigate ischemic complications associated with complete occlusion, but their efficacy and safety warrant further investigation. Beyond technical considerations, logistical and institutional factors pose as potential barriers to the effective utilization of REBOA, highlighting the importance of standardized training and a multidisciplinary approach when establishing a REBOA program. REBOA offers promising advancements in hemorrhage control, and the technology continues to evolve to address potential challenges and complications. Further research is imperative to delineate its optimal use and potential impact on patient outcomes.Keywords: traumatic hemorrhagic shock, REBOA, postpartum hemorrhage, partial REBOA, aortic occlusion, endovascular

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.