Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse

This report addresses the pressing challenge of technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA) by bridging the gap between the complexities of defining and classifying technology-facilitated CSEA and effective and appropriate responses and protection measures. Expert interviews, consultation and desk research reveal contrasting definitions and conceptions of technology-facilitated CSEA. These largely stem from the differences in terminology, context and the contrasting roles played by stakeholders, creating uncertainties and misunderstandings that impede effective responses. Building on these insights and a statistical analysis of the Disrupting Harm evidence, the report sets out six principles by which diverse stakeholders can reach agreement in understanding and responding to technology-facilitated CSEA. These support policymakers, researchers, and practitioners with a holistic and context-sensitive child rights approach to addressing technology-facilitated CSEA and provide an entry point for professionals new to or with limited prior experience with the subject matter.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse

article en

Abstract

This report addresses the pressing challenge of technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA) by bridging the gap between the complexities of defining and classifying technology-facilitated CSEA and effective and appropriate responses and protection measures. Expert interviews, consultation and desk research reveal contrasting definitions and conceptions of technology-facilitated CSEA. These largely stem from the differences in terminology, context and the contrasting roles played by stakeholders, creating uncertainties and misunderstandings that impede effective responses. Building on these insights and a statistical analysis of the Disrupting Harm evidence, the report sets out six principles by which diverse stakeholders can reach agreement in understanding and responding to technology-facilitated CSEA. These support policymakers, researchers, and practitioners with a holistic and context-sensitive child rights approach to addressing technology-facilitated CSEA and provide an entry point for professionals new to or with limited prior experience with the subject matter.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS