Expanding Public Access by Codifying the Public Trust Doctrine: The Massachusetts Experience

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts is dramatically expanding public access to the coast through statutory and regulatory codification of the public trust doctrine. Is this legislative and administrative experiment relevant to other states, particularly to Maine? The initial answer to this question may depend on the meaning of the Bell v. Town of Wells decision. For better or for worse, Massachusetts jurisprudence set the course followed by the majority of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in Bell. To some, including several of the authors in this symposium, the bearing of the Massachusetts courts leads to a civic wasteland where the public's interest is subservient to private property interests. To others, including the Maine Supreme Judicial Court majority, Massachusetts case law walks a "well-reasoned" path between private property rights and public access. But the Massachusetts case law relied on in Bell tells only half the story of the legal status of public access to the coast of Massachusetts.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-10-17
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expanding Public Access by Codifying the Public Trust Doctrine: The Massachusetts Experience

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Expanding Public Access by Codifying the Public Trust Doctrine: The Massachusetts Experience

article en

Abstract

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts is dramatically expanding public access to the coast through statutory and regulatory codification of the public trust doctrine. Is this legislative and administrative experiment relevant to other states, particularly to Maine? The initial answer to this question may depend on the meaning of the Bell v. Town of Wells decision. For better or for worse, Massachusetts jurisprudence set the course followed by the majority of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in Bell. To some, including several of the authors in this symposium, the bearing of the Massachusetts courts leads to a civic wasteland where the public's interest is subservient to private property interests. To others, including the Maine Supreme Judicial Court majority, Massachusetts case law walks a "well-reasoned" path between private property rights and public access. But the Massachusetts case law relied on in Bell tells only half the story of the legal status of public access to the coast of Massachusetts.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.