Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of Lumify Eye Illuminations Cosmetic Products

Gina Wesley,1 Melissa Morrison Toyos,2 Melinda M DiVito,3 Matthew Zirwas4 1Complete Eye Care, Medina, MN, USA; 2Toyos Clinic, Nashville, TN, USA; 3Medical Affairs, Bausch + Lomb, Bridgewater, NJ, USA; 4Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USACorrespondence: Gina Wesley, Complete Eye Care, 170 Westfalen Trail, Medina, MN, 55340, USA, Tel +1 763 478 3505, Fax +1 763 478 2727, Email [email protected]: Cosmetic products applied to the periocular area can cause skin sensitivity reactions, and manufacturers routinely test the safety and tolerability of products in development. This research was sponsored by Bausch + Lomb to evaluate three Lumify Eye Illuminations products: a lash and brow serum, a hydra-gel eye cream, and a micellar water eye makeup remover.Methods: A cumulative irritation test (CIT) study and a repeated insult patch test (RIPT) study enrolled adult males or females with no known sensitivities to cosmetic products. Three clinical safety studies enrolled adult females with self-reported characteristics targeted by each product, which was applied in a manner consistent with expected use for 8 or 12 weeks.Results: In CIT (n=34) and RIPT (n=201) studies, faint/minimal erythema reactions were observed in 0% to 2.9% of participants; there were no moderate or severe reactions. No safety signals were observed in participants who completed clinical safety studies for lash and brow serum (n=66 enrolled, n=55 completed [83%]), eye cream (n=61 enrolled, n=52 completed [85%]), or eye makeup remover (n=80 enrolled, n=68 completed [85%]). No clinically relevant changes in visual acuity or ophthalmologic slit-lamp examination findings were noted. No participants reported ocular sensations of burning/stinging, foreign-body sensation, or soreness. At the final clinical safety study assessment, mild cutaneous erythema (as graded by the investigator) was reported for one participant (eye cream study); no other prespecified signs of cutaneous irritation (eg, edema, dryness) were observed. A treatment-related adverse event that led to study discontinuation was experienced by one participant in the eye makeup remover study (bilateral periorbital swelling).Conclusion: Findings from rigorously conducted irritation testing and clinical safety studies indicated that these products were safe and well tolerated. Increased availability of data regarding ocular and cutaneous safety of cosmetic products can inform consumer decision-making and eye care provider recommendations.Keywords: cutaneous, cosmetics, irritation, periocular

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of Lumify Eye Illuminations Cosmetic Products

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of Lumify Eye Illuminations Cosmetic Products

article en

Abstract

Gina Wesley,1 Melissa Morrison Toyos,2 Melinda M DiVito,3 Matthew Zirwas4 1Complete Eye Care, Medina, MN, USA; 2Toyos Clinic, Nashville, TN, USA; 3Medical Affairs, Bausch + Lomb, Bridgewater, NJ, USA; 4Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USACorrespondence: Gina Wesley, Complete Eye Care, 170 Westfalen Trail, Medina, MN, 55340, USA, Tel +1 763 478 3505, Fax +1 763 478 2727, Email [email protected]: Cosmetic products applied to the periocular area can cause skin sensitivity reactions, and manufacturers routinely test the safety and tolerability of products in development. This research was sponsored by Bausch + Lomb to evaluate three Lumify Eye Illuminations products: a lash and brow serum, a hydra-gel eye cream, and a micellar water eye makeup remover.Methods: A cumulative irritation test (CIT) study and a repeated insult patch test (RIPT) study enrolled adult males or females with no known sensitivities to cosmetic products. Three clinical safety studies enrolled adult females with self-reported characteristics targeted by each product, which was applied in a manner consistent with expected use for 8 or 12 weeks.Results: In CIT (n=34) and RIPT (n=201) studies, faint/minimal erythema reactions were observed in 0% to 2.9% of participants; there were no moderate or severe reactions. No safety signals were observed in participants who completed clinical safety studies for lash and brow serum (n=66 enrolled, n=55 completed [83%]), eye cream (n=61 enrolled, n=52 completed [85%]), or eye makeup remover (n=80 enrolled, n=68 completed [85%]). No clinically relevant changes in visual acuity or ophthalmologic slit-lamp examination findings were noted. No participants reported ocular sensations of burning/stinging, foreign-body sensation, or soreness. At the final clinical safety study assessment, mild cutaneous erythema (as graded by the investigator) was reported for one participant (eye cream study); no other prespecified signs of cutaneous irritation (eg, edema, dryness) were observed. A treatment-related adverse event that led to study discontinuation was experienced by one participant in the eye makeup remover study (bilateral periorbital swelling).Conclusion: Findings from rigorously conducted irritation testing and clinical safety studies indicated that these products were safe and well tolerated. Increased availability of data regarding ocular and cutaneous safety of cosmetic products can inform consumer decision-making and eye care provider recommendations.Keywords: cutaneous, cosmetics, irritation, periocular

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.