The Effect of Ankle and Hallux Positioning on Hallux Force Production

The foot is not simply a rigid lever, but contributes substantially to movement energetics, primarily through muscle-tendon dynamics. However, more research is needed to understand how the small muscles of the foot generate and regulate force production. PURPOSE: We quantified the effects of ankle and hallux positioning on hallux flexion force production, isolating the contribution of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) and brevis (FHB). We hypothesized the FHL length changes would influence hallux force. METHODS: Eighteen healthy adult volunteers participated with written consent. Participants assumed each of four testing positions on a custom-built isometric toe flexion force sensor: ankle neutral (90°) – hallux neutral (0°) (ANHN), ankle neutral (0°) – hallux extended (30°) (ANHE), ankle plantarflexed (45°) - hallux neutral (0°) (APHN), and ankle plantarflexed (45°) – hallux extended (30°) (APHE). For each position, participants maximally pressed on the device for three seconds, with a one second representative plateau extracted for analysis. Force was averaged across 3 trials and analyzed with a repeated measures ANOVA and Holm pair-wise comparisons. RESULTS: There was a significant main effect (p<0.001). The ANHE condition produced the greatest force (17.3 ± 7.2 N); pairwise, this was significantly greater than the force in all other conditions except APHE. In this condition, the FHL was in its most lengthened position. Conversely, the APHN condition produced the least force (8.7 ± 4.6 N), which was pairwise significantly less than all other conditions. Here, the FHL was in its most shortened position. ANHN and APHE resulted in similar force production (13.8 ± 6.3 N and 14.5 ± 6.4 N, respectively). In both conditions one joint was altered, resulting in roughly similar FHL lengths despite FHB being longer in APHE. CONCLUSION: In plantarflexed positions, FHL shortens, reducing its effectiveness due to less optimal positioning of cross-fibers in sarcomeres. In hallux extended positions, FHL lengthens, increasing its effectiveness with more optimal positioning of cross fibers, regardless of ankle position. It also appears likely that the FHL contributed much more to hallux force than the FHB. We hope this information will ultimately influence applications in footwear design and rehabilitation.

Publication Details

Journal
TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Published
2024-11-06
Primary Topic
Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Ankle and Hallux Positioning on Hallux Force Production

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
article

The Effect of Ankle and Hallux Positioning on Hallux Force Production

article en

Abstract

The foot is not simply a rigid lever, but contributes substantially to movement energetics, primarily through muscle-tendon dynamics. However, more research is needed to understand how the small muscles of the foot generate and regulate force production. PURPOSE: We quantified the effects of ankle and hallux positioning on hallux flexion force production, isolating the contribution of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) and brevis (FHB). We hypothesized the FHL length changes would influence hallux force. METHODS: Eighteen healthy adult volunteers participated with written consent. Participants assumed each of four testing positions on a custom-built isometric toe flexion force sensor: ankle neutral (90°) – hallux neutral (0°) (ANHN), ankle neutral (0°) – hallux extended (30°) (ANHE), ankle plantarflexed (45°) - hallux neutral (0°) (APHN), and ankle plantarflexed (45°) – hallux extended (30°) (APHE). For each position, participants maximally pressed on the device for three seconds, with a one second representative plateau extracted for analysis. Force was averaged across 3 trials and analyzed with a repeated measures ANOVA and Holm pair-wise comparisons. RESULTS: There was a significant main effect (p<0.001). The ANHE condition produced the greatest force (17.3 ± 7.2 N); pairwise, this was significantly greater than the force in all other conditions except APHE. In this condition, the FHL was in its most lengthened position. Conversely, the APHN condition produced the least force (8.7 ± 4.6 N), which was pairwise significantly less than all other conditions. Here, the FHL was in its most shortened position. ANHN and APHE resulted in similar force production (13.8 ± 6.3 N and 14.5 ± 6.4 N, respectively). In both conditions one joint was altered, resulting in roughly similar FHL lengths despite FHB being longer in APHE. CONCLUSION: In plantarflexed positions, FHL shortens, reducing its effectiveness due to less optimal positioning of cross-fibers in sarcomeres. In hallux extended positions, FHL lengthens, increasing its effectiveness with more optimal positioning of cross fibers, regardless of ankle position. It also appears likely that the FHL contributed much more to hallux force than the FHB. We hope this information will ultimately influence applications in footwear design and rehabilitation.

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effect of Ankle and Hallux Positioning on Hallux Force Production · TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS