BMI and Mortality: The Diabetes-Obesity Paradox Examined in a Large US Cohort

Rebecca Baqiyyah Conway,1,2 Jooyoun Song,3 M Kathleen Figaro,4 Jyothi Sri Lokanadham,5 Wei Perng,1,5 Tessa Lee Crume,1,5 William J Blot6 1Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; 2American Academy of Epidemiology, Inc., Tyler, TX, USA; 3Department of Psychiatry, Jooyoun Song’s Psychiatry, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 4Heartland Endocrine Group, Davenport, IA, USA; 5LEAD Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; 6Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USACorrespondence: Rebecca Baqiyyah Conway, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Mail Stop B119, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA, Email [email protected]/Objectives: BMI is a major risk factor for diabetes incidence, but a controversial predictor of mortality among those with diabetes.Subjects/Methods: We conducted a mortality follow-up (2002– 2019) of participants aged 40– 79 with young-onset (diagnosed < age 30, n = 1335), older-onset (diagnosed ≥ 30, n = 15,194), and without (n = 62,295) diabetes at cohort entry. Cox analysis with age as the time scale assessing mortality according to BMI after adjusting for multiple potential confounding factors was used.Results: Mean baseline age and diabetes duration at cohort entry were 50.1 and 29.4 years and 55.3 and 7.7 years among those with young- and older-onset diabetes, respectively. During an average of 12.3 years of follow-up, 47% of the young-onset, 40% of the older-onset diabetes, and 22.6% of those without diabetes at cohort entry died. In multivariable adjusted analyses, compared to a BMI of 18.5-< 25 kg/m2, HRs (95% CIs) were 4.10 (1.65– 10.18), 0.69 (0.54– 0.88), 0.81 (0.63– 1.05), 0.64 (0.48– 0.86) and 0.64 (0.54– 0.77) for BMI categories < 18.5, 25-< 30 30-< 35, 35-< 40, 40+ kg/m2 in those with young-onset diabetes. Corresponding HRs (95% CIs) were 2.02 (1.54– 2.67), 0.74 (0.68– 0.80), 0.74 (0.68– 0.80), 0.83 (0.75– 0.91) and 1.09 (0.99– 1.19) in those with older-onset diabetes, and 1.50 (1.36– 1.67), 0.76 (0.73– 0.79), 0.73 (0.70– 0.77), 0.83 (0.78– 0.89) and 1.03 (0.95– 1.10) in those without diabetes. Results were generally similar in analyses stratified by smoking status, gender, race and among those on insulin therapy.Conclusion: Among this low socioeconomic status population with diabetes, overweight and obesity tend to be inversely associated with mortality. Risk factors for complications of diabetes other than BMI may be more clinically relevant when treating patients with diabetes.Keywords: diabetes, BMI, obesity, obesity paradox

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BMI and Mortality: The Diabetes-Obesity Paradox Examined in a Large US Cohort

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

BMI and Mortality: The Diabetes-Obesity Paradox Examined in a Large US Cohort

article en

Abstract

Rebecca Baqiyyah Conway,1,2 Jooyoun Song,3 M Kathleen Figaro,4 Jyothi Sri Lokanadham,5 Wei Perng,1,5 Tessa Lee Crume,1,5 William J Blot6 1Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; 2American Academy of Epidemiology, Inc., Tyler, TX, USA; 3Department of Psychiatry, Jooyoun Song’s Psychiatry, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 4Heartland Endocrine Group, Davenport, IA, USA; 5LEAD Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; 6Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USACorrespondence: Rebecca Baqiyyah Conway, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Mail Stop B119, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA, Email [email protected]/Objectives: BMI is a major risk factor for diabetes incidence, but a controversial predictor of mortality among those with diabetes.Subjects/Methods: We conducted a mortality follow-up (2002– 2019) of participants aged 40– 79 with young-onset (diagnosed < age 30, n = 1335), older-onset (diagnosed ≥ 30, n = 15,194), and without (n = 62,295) diabetes at cohort entry. Cox analysis with age as the time scale assessing mortality according to BMI after adjusting for multiple potential confounding factors was used.Results: Mean baseline age and diabetes duration at cohort entry were 50.1 and 29.4 years and 55.3 and 7.7 years among those with young- and older-onset diabetes, respectively. During an average of 12.3 years of follow-up, 47% of the young-onset, 40% of the older-onset diabetes, and 22.6% of those without diabetes at cohort entry died. In multivariable adjusted analyses, compared to a BMI of 18.5-< 25 kg/m2, HRs (95% CIs) were 4.10 (1.65– 10.18), 0.69 (0.54– 0.88), 0.81 (0.63– 1.05), 0.64 (0.48– 0.86) and 0.64 (0.54– 0.77) for BMI categories < 18.5, 25-< 30 30-< 35, 35-< 40, 40+ kg/m2 in those with young-onset diabetes. Corresponding HRs (95% CIs) were 2.02 (1.54– 2.67), 0.74 (0.68– 0.80), 0.74 (0.68– 0.80), 0.83 (0.75– 0.91) and 1.09 (0.99– 1.19) in those with older-onset diabetes, and 1.50 (1.36– 1.67), 0.76 (0.73– 0.79), 0.73 (0.70– 0.77), 0.83 (0.78– 0.89) and 1.03 (0.95– 1.10) in those without diabetes. Results were generally similar in analyses stratified by smoking status, gender, race and among those on insulin therapy.Conclusion: Among this low socioeconomic status population with diabetes, overweight and obesity tend to be inversely associated with mortality. Risk factors for complications of diabetes other than BMI may be more clinically relevant when treating patients with diabetes.Keywords: diabetes, BMI, obesity, obesity paradox

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.