A Call for Statutory Reform: Online Marketplaces that Profit from Product Sales Should Be Held Strictly Liable as Sellers

Today, Americans purchase roughly 16% of all consumer goods through online marketplaces such as Amazon. While traditional brick-and-mortar retailers that sell defective products are strictly liable for harm caused by those products, online marketplace retailers, which serve analogous roles in defective product sales, can often evade liability entirely. Amazon, for instance, is immune from liability for product defects in more than 60% of sales conducted on its website in almost every state. This Note explains why online marketplaces that profit from defective product sales should be strictly liable for harm those products cause, and why courts often refuse to hold them liable nonetheless. It then examines proposed legislation holding online marketplace retailers accountable for such harm, before setting forth a model statute.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Laser Design and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Call for Statutory Reform: Online Marketplaces that Profit from Product Sales Should Be Held Strictly Liable as Sellers

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Laser Design and Applications
article

A Call for Statutory Reform: Online Marketplaces that Profit from Product Sales Should Be Held Strictly Liable as Sellers

article en

Abstract

Today, Americans purchase roughly 16% of all consumer goods through online marketplaces such as Amazon. While traditional brick-and-mortar retailers that sell defective products are strictly liable for harm caused by those products, online marketplace retailers, which serve analogous roles in defective product sales, can often evade liability entirely. Amazon, for instance, is immune from liability for product defects in more than 60% of sales conducted on its website in almost every state. This Note explains why online marketplaces that profit from defective product sales should be strictly liable for harm those products cause, and why courts often refuse to hold them liable nonetheless. It then examines proposed legislation holding online marketplace retailers accountable for such harm, before setting forth a model statute.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Laser Design and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Call for Statutory Reform: Online Marketplaces that Profit from Product Sales Should Be Held Strictly Liable as Sellers · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS