Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain

Suhui Qian,1,&ast; Ziying Meng,2,&ast; Haiyan Zhang,1 Kaicheng Li,1 Fei Zhang,1 Sen Zhang,1 Jianfei Liu,1 Zhou Zhou1 1Department of Stomatology, Huaibei People’s Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China; 2Stomatology Department of Suixi County Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Zhou Zhou, Email [email protected]: This study aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy of articaine needle-free anesthesia with conventional lidocaine nerve block anesthesia for root canal treatment in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis.Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, 94 patients were randomly allocated to receive either articaine needle-free anesthesia (n=47) or lidocaine nerve block anesthesia (n=47). Anesthetic effectiveness was evaluated through onset time, success rate, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during crown opening and pulp removal procedures. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) and incidence of adverse reactions.Results: The articaine group exhibited significantly faster anesthesia onset (7.62± 1.28 minutes vs 9.35± 2.04 minutes, p< 0.05) and higher success rate (93.62% vs 80.85%, p< 0.05). Patients receiving articaine reported significantly lower pain scores during crown opening (4.31± 1.13 vs 5.48± 1.06) and pulp removal (3.18± 1.07 vs 4.26± 1.12) (both p< 0.05). Both groups maintained comparable hemodynamic stability throughout the procedure (p> 0.05), with no significant difference in adverse reaction rates (11.49% vs 10.64%, p> 0.05).Conclusion: Articaine needle-free anesthesia demonstrates superior clinical performance compared to conventional lidocaine nerve block, offering faster onset, improved success rate, and enhanced pain control during root canal treatment of irreversible pulpitis, while maintaining equivalent safety parameters. These findings support its adoption as an effective alternative for dental anesthesia in endodontic procedures.Keywords: articaine needle-free anesthesia, conventional anesthesia, irreversible pulpitis, root canal treatment, effects, pain, impact

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain

article en

Abstract

Suhui Qian,1,&ast; Ziying Meng,2,&ast; Haiyan Zhang,1 Kaicheng Li,1 Fei Zhang,1 Sen Zhang,1 Jianfei Liu,1 Zhou Zhou1 1Department of Stomatology, Huaibei People’s Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China; 2Stomatology Department of Suixi County Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Zhou Zhou, Email [email protected]: This study aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy of articaine needle-free anesthesia with conventional lidocaine nerve block anesthesia for root canal treatment in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis.Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, 94 patients were randomly allocated to receive either articaine needle-free anesthesia (n=47) or lidocaine nerve block anesthesia (n=47). Anesthetic effectiveness was evaluated through onset time, success rate, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during crown opening and pulp removal procedures. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) and incidence of adverse reactions.Results: The articaine group exhibited significantly faster anesthesia onset (7.62± 1.28 minutes vs 9.35± 2.04 minutes, p< 0.05) and higher success rate (93.62% vs 80.85%, p< 0.05). Patients receiving articaine reported significantly lower pain scores during crown opening (4.31± 1.13 vs 5.48± 1.06) and pulp removal (3.18± 1.07 vs 4.26± 1.12) (both p< 0.05). Both groups maintained comparable hemodynamic stability throughout the procedure (p> 0.05), with no significant difference in adverse reaction rates (11.49% vs 10.64%, p> 0.05).Conclusion: Articaine needle-free anesthesia demonstrates superior clinical performance compared to conventional lidocaine nerve block, offering faster onset, improved success rate, and enhanced pain control during root canal treatment of irreversible pulpitis, while maintaining equivalent safety parameters. These findings support its adoption as an effective alternative for dental anesthesia in endodontic procedures.Keywords: articaine needle-free anesthesia, conventional anesthesia, irreversible pulpitis, root canal treatment, effects, pain, impact

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.