Algorithmic-driven Social (in)Injustice in Law Enforcement: A Critical Race Theory Perspective

Algorithmic decision-making systems (ADMS), especially when embedded in AI systems, have recently been the focus of social injustice research. In the US, law scholarship uses Critical Race Theory (CRT) to explain how and why social injustice still affects marginalized communities. For instance, algorithms perpetuate discrimination and can be supported by the juridical system and law enforcement because of systemic racism, which is embedded in historical racial discrimination. In this paper, after reviewing the extant literature on algorithmic discrimination associated with structural racism, we present vignettes of such types of discrimination (i.e., due to structural racism) in India, Italy, Pakistan, and the US. The vignettes focus on how law enforcement leverages algorithmic-based technologies to exercise power and maintain the status quo. We showcase that structural racism is inherently tied to institutional inertia and contribute to the interdisciplinary debate of the (mis) use of ADMS and the associated consequences for social justice.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic-driven Social (in)Injustice in Law Enforcement: A Critical Race Theory Perspective

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
article

Algorithmic-driven Social (in)Injustice in Law Enforcement: A Critical Race Theory Perspective

article en

Abstract

Algorithmic decision-making systems (ADMS), especially when embedded in AI systems, have recently been the focus of social injustice research. In the US, law scholarship uses Critical Race Theory (CRT) to explain how and why social injustice still affects marginalized communities. For instance, algorithms perpetuate discrimination and can be supported by the juridical system and law enforcement because of systemic racism, which is embedded in historical racial discrimination. In this paper, after reviewing the extant literature on algorithmic discrimination associated with structural racism, we present vignettes of such types of discrimination (i.e., due to structural racism) in India, Italy, Pakistan, and the US. The vignettes focus on how law enforcement leverages algorithmic-based technologies to exercise power and maintain the status quo. We showcase that structural racism is inherently tied to institutional inertia and contribute to the interdisciplinary debate of the (mis) use of ADMS and the associated consequences for social justice.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Bentley University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.