When people overload the/their stomach(s): Non-Verbal Plural Number Agreement and Generic Reference in Early and Late Modern Medical Discourse

This study examines the use of distributive singular and plural forms of stomach in Early and Late Modern English medical regimens, drawing on data from the Early Modern English Medical Texts (EMEMT) and Late Modern English Medical Texts (LMEMT) corpora. The study explores distributive number preferences in English from both a discourse-domain and historical perspective, areas that have not been extensively examined. The findings show that despite the preference for plural forms in modern English, there is at least one scenario – a generalizing context – where free variation between singular and plural forms can be observed since at least the 16th century. Additionally, the results reveal that the most common way of conveying generic meaning in this historical period and genre of regimens was through the definite article, while other modern forms – such as singular they and other personal pronouns – are either absent (singular they) or rarely used.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2025-11-26
Primary Topic
Laser Design and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When people overload the/their stomach(s): Non-Verbal Plural Number Agreement and Generic Reference in Early and Late Modern Medical Discourse

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Laser Design and Applications
article

When people overload the/their stomach(s): Non-Verbal Plural Number Agreement and Generic Reference in Early and Late Modern Medical Discourse

article en

Abstract

This study examines the use of distributive singular and plural forms of stomach in Early and Late Modern English medical regimens, drawing on data from the Early Modern English Medical Texts (EMEMT) and Late Modern English Medical Texts (LMEMT) corpora. The study explores distributive number preferences in English from both a discourse-domain and historical perspective, areas that have not been extensively examined. The findings show that despite the preference for plural forms in modern English, there is at least one scenario – a generalizing context – where free variation between singular and plural forms can be observed since at least the 16th century. Additionally, the results reveal that the most common way of conveying generic meaning in this historical period and genre of regimens was through the definite article, while other modern forms – such as singular they and other personal pronouns – are either absent (singular they) or rarely used.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Laser Design and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.