Treatment Strategies for Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Narrative Review

Lei Yue,* Changsheng Huang,* Jianming Zhang, Ziqi Wang, Shijun Wang, Haolin Sun Department of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Haolin Sun, Department of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: Distal clavicle fractures, accounting for a significant portion of clavicle fractures, present a treatment challenge due to their high non-union rate and the controversy surrounding operative versus non-operative management strategies. This review synthesizes recent studies and clinical evidence to compare the effectiveness of operative and non-operative approaches for distal clavicle fractures. It discusses the anatomical and classification aspects of these fractures, the indications for surgery, and the rationale behind different treatment options. Surgical fixation, predominantly through locking plates or hook plates, generally provides high union rates and stable outcomes; however, complications such as hardware irritation, subacromial impingement, and implant removal rates are significant concerns. Recent surgical advancements, including ligament repair, distal augmentation, and arthroscopic techniques, have shown promise in improving outcomes. Conversely, conservative treatment is recommended for certain fracture types, with emerging evidence suggesting it provides comparable functional outcomes to those of surgical methods. Despite a high non-union rate, non-operative treatment can be effective in restoring functions. However, challenges such as symptomatic nonunion and osteoarthritis are noted. The choice between surgical and conservative treatments depends on multiple factors, including fracture type, patient age, activity level, and overall health status. This review highlights the need for a personalized approach in managing distal clavicle fractures, considering the evolving evidence and advancements in treatment strategies.Keywords: distal clavicle fracture, surgery, conservative treatment, neer classification

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Laser Design and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment Strategies for Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Narrative Review

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Laser Design and Applications
article

Treatment Strategies for Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Narrative Review

article en

Abstract

Lei Yue,* Changsheng Huang,* Jianming Zhang, Ziqi Wang, Shijun Wang, Haolin Sun Department of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Haolin Sun, Department of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: Distal clavicle fractures, accounting for a significant portion of clavicle fractures, present a treatment challenge due to their high non-union rate and the controversy surrounding operative versus non-operative management strategies. This review synthesizes recent studies and clinical evidence to compare the effectiveness of operative and non-operative approaches for distal clavicle fractures. It discusses the anatomical and classification aspects of these fractures, the indications for surgery, and the rationale behind different treatment options. Surgical fixation, predominantly through locking plates or hook plates, generally provides high union rates and stable outcomes; however, complications such as hardware irritation, subacromial impingement, and implant removal rates are significant concerns. Recent surgical advancements, including ligament repair, distal augmentation, and arthroscopic techniques, have shown promise in improving outcomes. Conversely, conservative treatment is recommended for certain fracture types, with emerging evidence suggesting it provides comparable functional outcomes to those of surgical methods. Despite a high non-union rate, non-operative treatment can be effective in restoring functions. However, challenges such as symptomatic nonunion and osteoarthritis are noted. The choice between surgical and conservative treatments depends on multiple factors, including fracture type, patient age, activity level, and overall health status. This review highlights the need for a personalized approach in managing distal clavicle fractures, considering the evolving evidence and advancements in treatment strategies.Keywords: distal clavicle fracture, surgery, conservative treatment, neer classification

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University Orthopedics Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Laser Design and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.