Should A(I) Design? - Toward a Comparative Reusability Analysis of Design Principles Conceptualized by Generative AI and Humans

This study explores the integration of generative artificial intelligence (gAI) into design science research (DSR), focusing on conceptualizing and generating design principles. Recent developments in gAI have positioned these technologies as powerful collaborative tools for creating and adapting design components and enhancing efficiency and creativity in information systems (IS) research. Our research-in-progress study examines the reusability of human- and AI-generated design principles under the theoretical lens of bounded rationality. Through a survey-based comparative analysis, preliminary findings indicate that human-generated and AI-generated design principles generally achieve high levels of accessibility, importance, novelty, explanatory power, and conciseness. However, subtle differences in actionability, effectiveness, and practical applicability suggest distinct nuances in their conceptual constructions. Our study contributes to the understanding of the interplay between human cognitive processes and gAI capabilities. It highlights implications for integrating gAI into the conceptual phase of knowledge generation in IS and design research.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-06-18
Primary Topic
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should A(I) Design? - Toward a Comparative Reusability Analysis of Design Principles Conceptualized by Generative AI and Humans

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
article

Should A(I) Design? - Toward a Comparative Reusability Analysis of Design Principles Conceptualized by Generative AI and Humans

article en

Abstract

This study explores the integration of generative artificial intelligence (gAI) into design science research (DSR), focusing on conceptualizing and generating design principles. Recent developments in gAI have positioned these technologies as powerful collaborative tools for creating and adapting design components and enhancing efficiency and creativity in information systems (IS) research. Our research-in-progress study examines the reusability of human- and AI-generated design principles under the theoretical lens of bounded rationality. Through a survey-based comparative analysis, preliminary findings indicate that human-generated and AI-generated design principles generally achieve high levels of accessibility, importance, novelty, explanatory power, and conciseness. However, subtle differences in actionability, effectiveness, and practical applicability suggest distinct nuances in their conceptual constructions. Our study contributes to the understanding of the interplay between human cognitive processes and gAI capabilities. It highlights implications for integrating gAI into the conceptual phase of knowledge generation in IS and design research.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Should A(I) Design? - Toward a Comparative Reusability Analysis of Design Principles Conceptualized by Generative AI and Humans · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS