Refractive surgery: principles, techniques, and advances

Left uncorrected, refractive errors result from irregularities or imperfections in the shape of the cornea or lens that make up the defects that can be corrected by surgery include: myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia. Surgical intervention for the removal or significant reduction of the need for glasses was gaining more preference over them on a long-term basis. Refractive surgery then became more fashionable than glasses and contact lenses since the late 1900s when laser and intraocular surgery became popular because it was much safer and effective used in both procedures. One of the refractive surgery techniques, called Radial keratotomy (RK), came about back in the 1970s, implying an alteration in corneal shape by means of radial corneal incisions. Functionally, however, that method was accompanied by a problem with vision fluctuation and corneal wobbling. The excimer laser technology had influenced eye surgery in the 1980s due to the accurate and effective surgical procedures introduced; among those was photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The recent progress in femtosecond laser technology, as well as corneal inlays and IOL implants, makes the surgical option wider; these, then, are enhanced by such diagnostic tools as corneal tomography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) even further through personalized therapy approaches. Most common refractive surgeries include PRK, LASIK, small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), and implantable collamer lenses (ICL). Patients who are thin-corneal or LASIK candidates at risk for complications may have PRK benefit. This operation takes longer to heal, while LASIK is the one that sees most surgery as it is characterized by short recovery and higher patient satisfaction, but causes a dry eye and flap complication. SMILE minimally invasive surgery has been proposed as a method with corneal biomechanics preserved and dry eye risk reduced, mostly in cases of myopia and mild astigmatism. ICLs work best in the case of individuals with extreme levels of refractive errors and for patients who are contraindicated for corneal surgery. There are certain complications following refractive surgery, such as dry eye, glare, and corneal ectasia; although refractive surgery is generally considered safe. Screening and surgical improvements, such as corneal cross-linking, have a positive effect on the results. Refractive surgery in the future may incorporate advancements like gene therapy, corneal inlays, and non-surgical options, with a circuitously approaching avenue of customization and efficacy dependent on the patient

Publication Details

Journal
Goce Delchev University Repository (Goce Delčev University of Štip)
Published
2025-04-05
Primary Topic
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refractive surgery: principles, techniques, and advances

Goce Delchev University Repository (Goce Delčev University of Štip)
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
article

Refractive surgery: principles, techniques, and advances

article en

Abstract

Left uncorrected, refractive errors result from irregularities or imperfections in the shape of the cornea or lens that make up the defects that can be corrected by surgery include: myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia. Surgical intervention for the removal or significant reduction of the need for glasses was gaining more preference over them on a long-term basis. Refractive surgery then became more fashionable than glasses and contact lenses since the late 1900s when laser and intraocular surgery became popular because it was much safer and effective used in both procedures. One of the refractive surgery techniques, called Radial keratotomy (RK), came about back in the 1970s, implying an alteration in corneal shape by means of radial corneal incisions. Functionally, however, that method was accompanied by a problem with vision fluctuation and corneal wobbling. The excimer laser technology had influenced eye surgery in the 1980s due to the accurate and effective surgical procedures introduced; among those was photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The recent progress in femtosecond laser technology, as well as corneal inlays and IOL implants, makes the surgical option wider; these, then, are enhanced by such diagnostic tools as corneal tomography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) even further through personalized therapy approaches. Most common refractive surgeries include PRK, LASIK, small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), and implantable collamer lenses (ICL). Patients who are thin-corneal or LASIK candidates at risk for complications may have PRK benefit. This operation takes longer to heal, while LASIK is the one that sees most surgery as it is characterized by short recovery and higher patient satisfaction, but causes a dry eye and flap complication. SMILE minimally invasive surgery has been proposed as a method with corneal biomechanics preserved and dry eye risk reduced, mostly in cases of myopia and mild astigmatism. ICLs work best in the case of individuals with extreme levels of refractive errors and for patients who are contraindicated for corneal surgery. There are certain complications following refractive surgery, such as dry eye, glare, and corneal ectasia; although refractive surgery is generally considered safe. Screening and surgical improvements, such as corneal cross-linking, have a positive effect on the results. Refractive surgery in the future may incorporate advancements like gene therapy, corneal inlays, and non-surgical options, with a circuitously approaching avenue of customization and efficacy dependent on the patient

Goce Delchev University Repository (Goce Delčev University of Štip)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.