THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF RESILIENCE IN THE UKRAINE AND ISRAEL CONFLICTS

The text explores the concept of resilience in the face of conflict, comparing Ukraine and Israel as case studies. Resilience is significantly influenced by psychological factors and the ability of societies to adapt to and recover from traumatic events. In Ukraine, national resilience was initially high due to a surge in national unity and international support but declined over time due to prolonged conflict, war fatigue and decreased trust in the government. Israel, on the other hand, has maintained a higher and more stable level of resilience due to its historical experience with conflict, strong governmental support, social cohesion and well-established mental health and social support systems. Key factors of resilience identified include trust in government, patriotism, social integration and trust in state institutions. Both countries demonstrate that government support, social cohesion and trust in institutions are crucial in fostering resilience during prolonged conflicts. Israel’s continuous state of preparedness and effective mental health infrastructure contribute to its consistently higher individual resilience and morale compared to Ukraine.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF RESILIENCE IN THE UKRAINE AND ISRAEL CONFLICTS

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
article

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF RESILIENCE IN THE UKRAINE AND ISRAEL CONFLICTS

article en

Abstract

The text explores the concept of resilience in the face of conflict, comparing Ukraine and Israel as case studies. Resilience is significantly influenced by psychological factors and the ability of societies to adapt to and recover from traumatic events. In Ukraine, national resilience was initially high due to a surge in national unity and international support but declined over time due to prolonged conflict, war fatigue and decreased trust in the government. Israel, on the other hand, has maintained a higher and more stable level of resilience due to its historical experience with conflict, strong governmental support, social cohesion and well-established mental health and social support systems. Key factors of resilience identified include trust in government, patriotism, social integration and trust in state institutions. Both countries demonstrate that government support, social cohesion and trust in institutions are crucial in fostering resilience during prolonged conflicts. Israel’s continuous state of preparedness and effective mental health infrastructure contribute to its consistently higher individual resilience and morale compared to Ukraine.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF RESILIENCE IN THE UKRAINE AND ISRAEL CONFLICTS · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS