A Multi-Institutional Study Regarding the Perceptions of Students and Faculty Members About Constructive Feedback for Medical Students in Medical Education

Reshma Fatteh,1 Ye Phayo,2 Murtajiz Mehdi Raza,1 Tun Tun Naing,2 Zaw Phyo,2 Sateesh B Arja1 1Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao; 2Defense Services Medical Academy, Pyin Oo Lwin, MyanmarCorrespondence: Reshma Fatteh, Mind, Brain and Behavior Department, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao, Tel +5999 7241181, Email [email protected]: Feedback is defined as the regular mechanism where the effect of an action is to modify and improve the future action. Feedback is essential for developing students’ competencies and their future work as professionals. The attention of feedback shifted from teachers’ feedback techniques to learners’ goals, acceptance, and assimilation of feedback and impact-focused approaches. This study explored the perceptions of medical students and faculty regarding the importance of constructive feedback and the process of feedback in medical education.Methods: An explanatory, sequential, mixed-method approach was used, beginning with a survey followed by interviews. This study was conducted at Defense Services Medical Academy (DSMA), Myanmar, and Avalon University School of Medicine (AUSOM), Willemstad, Curacao, from November 2021 to October 2022. For the quantitative phase, 75 students of Phase I, M.B.B.S. program, 28 faculty from DSMA. 63 students of the M.D. program, and 13 faculty from AUSOM responded to the questionnaire survey. For the qualitative phase, ten students and ten faculty members from each university used in-depth interviews. We used MAXQDA software for thematic analysis.Findings: Survey results showed that most faculty and students strongly agree that feedback is essential for students’ learning and should highlight both strengths and weaknesses of student performance. Thematic analysis resulted in five themes: opinions regarding the feedback, obstacles in obtaining constructive feedback, incorporating constructive feedback to future professions, implementing feedback, and comparing the views of students and professors. The students wanted immediate feedback after the examinations. They preferred one-to-one feedback instead of group feedback, but the faculty was concerned about time limitations in providing constructive one-to-one feedback.Conclusion: The students and faculty agree that constructive feedback is essential to improve performance. The students at both institutes preferred precise comments regarding performance. The barrier both faculty and students faced around giving and receiving feedback was time.Keywords: feedback, student support, assessments, formative assessment, constructive feedback

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi-Institutional Study Regarding the Perceptions of Students and Faculty Members About Constructive Feedback for Medical Students in Medical Education

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

A Multi-Institutional Study Regarding the Perceptions of Students and Faculty Members About Constructive Feedback for Medical Students in Medical Education

article en

Abstract

Reshma Fatteh,1 Ye Phayo,2 Murtajiz Mehdi Raza,1 Tun Tun Naing,2 Zaw Phyo,2 Sateesh B Arja1 1Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao; 2Defense Services Medical Academy, Pyin Oo Lwin, MyanmarCorrespondence: Reshma Fatteh, Mind, Brain and Behavior Department, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao, Tel +5999 7241181, Email [email protected]: Feedback is defined as the regular mechanism where the effect of an action is to modify and improve the future action. Feedback is essential for developing students’ competencies and their future work as professionals. The attention of feedback shifted from teachers’ feedback techniques to learners’ goals, acceptance, and assimilation of feedback and impact-focused approaches. This study explored the perceptions of medical students and faculty regarding the importance of constructive feedback and the process of feedback in medical education.Methods: An explanatory, sequential, mixed-method approach was used, beginning with a survey followed by interviews. This study was conducted at Defense Services Medical Academy (DSMA), Myanmar, and Avalon University School of Medicine (AUSOM), Willemstad, Curacao, from November 2021 to October 2022. For the quantitative phase, 75 students of Phase I, M.B.B.S. program, 28 faculty from DSMA. 63 students of the M.D. program, and 13 faculty from AUSOM responded to the questionnaire survey. For the qualitative phase, ten students and ten faculty members from each university used in-depth interviews. We used MAXQDA software for thematic analysis.Findings: Survey results showed that most faculty and students strongly agree that feedback is essential for students’ learning and should highlight both strengths and weaknesses of student performance. Thematic analysis resulted in five themes: opinions regarding the feedback, obstacles in obtaining constructive feedback, incorporating constructive feedback to future professions, implementing feedback, and comparing the views of students and professors. The students wanted immediate feedback after the examinations. They preferred one-to-one feedback instead of group feedback, but the faculty was concerned about time limitations in providing constructive one-to-one feedback.Conclusion: The students and faculty agree that constructive feedback is essential to improve performance. The students at both institutes preferred precise comments regarding performance. The barrier both faculty and students faced around giving and receiving feedback was time.Keywords: feedback, student support, assessments, formative assessment, constructive feedback

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.