Navigating the ideological tideDiscourses on “Mainstreaming” social service provision for multicultural communities in Australia from 1996 to 2021

This paper examines if and how policy discourses about social service provisions to multicultural communities are affected by the so-called backlash against multiculturalism, which began in Europe and the UK, and how this backlash has influenced Australia. Ideological approaches to social policy changes are often implicit, manifesting through long-term shifts in public discourses. This paper presents a critical discourse analysis of public and policy documents referencing service provision for multicultural communities from 1996 to 2021. The analysis finds that since the 1996 election of the Howard government, Australian public discourse on diversity governance has increasingly emphasised mainstreaming as an approach to diversity governance. These mainstreaming discourses are ideologically expressed in inclusionary and exclusionary forms that either over-emphasise or normalise Australia’s ethno-cultural diversity. Findings also show dissonances between public discourse and policy on this mainstreamed approach, which can have a detrimental impact on intersectional communities facing marginalisation and inequity.

Publication Details

Journal
OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
Published
2025-03-10
Primary Topic
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the ideological tideDiscourses on “Mainstreaming” social service provision for multicultural communities in Australia from 1996 to 2021

OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
article

Navigating the ideological tideDiscourses on “Mainstreaming” social service provision for multicultural communities in Australia from 1996 to 2021

article en

Abstract

This paper examines if and how policy discourses about social service provisions to multicultural communities are affected by the so-called backlash against multiculturalism, which began in Europe and the UK, and how this backlash has influenced Australia. Ideological approaches to social policy changes are often implicit, manifesting through long-term shifts in public discourses. This paper presents a critical discourse analysis of public and policy documents referencing service provision for multicultural communities from 1996 to 2021. The analysis finds that since the 1996 election of the Howard government, Australian public discourse on diversity governance has increasingly emphasised mainstreaming as an approach to diversity governance. These mainstreaming discourses are ideologically expressed in inclusionary and exclusionary forms that either over-emphasise or normalise Australia’s ethno-cultural diversity. Findings also show dissonances between public discourse and policy on this mainstreamed approach, which can have a detrimental impact on intersectional communities facing marginalisation and inequity.

OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating the ideological tideDiscourses on “Mainstreaming” social service provision for multicultural communities in Australia from 1996 to 2021 · OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS