Meals on Duty: The Case for Excluding Meal Reimbursements for Law Enforcement

This article advocates for the extension of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 119 exclusion to cover cash reimbursements for meals provided to law enforcement officers. Currently, § 119 excludes meals furnished by an employer from gross income, but not cash reimbursements. The unique demand placed on law enforcement officers, including the requirement to remain on-call during meals, justify the inclusion of these reimbursements within the scope of § 119. Through a comprehensive analysis of legislative intent, case law, and the “substance over form” doctrine, this article argues that cash reimbursements serve the same substantial business purpose as meals-in-kind and should be considered non-compensatory. The article proposes limiting the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Commissioner v. Kowalski to cash allowances and extending §119’s coverage to reimbursements for law enforcement officers, ensuring equitable tax treatment. This revision would support operational efficiency of these necessary public servants while promoting fairness in the tax code.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meals on Duty: The Case for Excluding Meal Reimbursements for Law Enforcement

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Meals on Duty: The Case for Excluding Meal Reimbursements for Law Enforcement

article en

Abstract

This article advocates for the extension of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 119 exclusion to cover cash reimbursements for meals provided to law enforcement officers. Currently, § 119 excludes meals furnished by an employer from gross income, but not cash reimbursements. The unique demand placed on law enforcement officers, including the requirement to remain on-call during meals, justify the inclusion of these reimbursements within the scope of § 119. Through a comprehensive analysis of legislative intent, case law, and the “substance over form” doctrine, this article argues that cash reimbursements serve the same substantial business purpose as meals-in-kind and should be considered non-compensatory. The article proposes limiting the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Commissioner v. Kowalski to cash allowances and extending §119’s coverage to reimbursements for law enforcement officers, ensuring equitable tax treatment. This revision would support operational efficiency of these necessary public servants while promoting fairness in the tax code.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.