Leveraging Generative AI in Enterprise Contexts: Towards a Paradox Theory and Organizational Boundary Work Approach

Firms seeking to implement generative artificial solutions (GenAI) encounter several tensions, such as sharing data to improve GenAI model performance while retaining control over data. These tensions are paradoxical, as they are persistent and require continuous management rather than resolution. This study investigates these paradoxical tensions in the GenAI enterprise context through an exploratory qualitative study, based on interviews with 13 GenAI experts and analyses of secondary data. We construct a two-part theoretical lens to analyze our insights: paradox theory to understand the tensions, and boundary work theory to explore firms’ responses to these tensions. Our preliminary findings identify three main elements – performance, convenience, and control – that explain these paradoxical tensions. Additionally, our results reveal that the strategies for responding to these tensions are intricately linked across various GenAI activities and firms within the GenAI ecosystem. Our research contributes to organizational AI/GenAI, paradox theory, and boundary work literature.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging Generative AI in Enterprise Contexts: Towards a Paradox Theory and Organizational Boundary Work Approach

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Leveraging Generative AI in Enterprise Contexts: Towards a Paradox Theory and Organizational Boundary Work Approach

article en

Abstract

Firms seeking to implement generative artificial solutions (GenAI) encounter several tensions, such as sharing data to improve GenAI model performance while retaining control over data. These tensions are paradoxical, as they are persistent and require continuous management rather than resolution. This study investigates these paradoxical tensions in the GenAI enterprise context through an exploratory qualitative study, based on interviews with 13 GenAI experts and analyses of secondary data. We construct a two-part theoretical lens to analyze our insights: paradox theory to understand the tensions, and boundary work theory to explore firms’ responses to these tensions. Our preliminary findings identify three main elements – performance, convenience, and control – that explain these paradoxical tensions. Additionally, our results reveal that the strategies for responding to these tensions are intricately linked across various GenAI activities and firms within the GenAI ecosystem. Our research contributes to organizational AI/GenAI, paradox theory, and boundary work literature.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leveraging Generative AI in Enterprise Contexts: Towards a Paradox Theory and Organizational Boundary Work Approach · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS