Leading up perspectives of the heads of departments and schools on their interactions with hierarchy in UK universities.pdf

<p dir="ltr">This study explores the locale of cross-level leadership interactions in universities, where leaders who lead academic units, departments or schools interact with institutional-level leaders. Drawing on interviews with heads of academic units in UK universities, the five-dimensional model of leadership practice was adopted as a framework to analyse the personal, social, structural, and contextual factors that impact the quality and outcome of hierarchical interactions for the unit head. The findings illustrate the heterogeneity of middle leadership experiences due to the manifold factors that influence interactional dynamics and impact practices in situ. A greater concern about responsiveness in university leadership is highlighted because of the embedded nature of middle leadership practices. Concurrently, by providing insights into the areas of interactional tensions for the middle leaders, potential avenues for enhancing leadership responsiveness in the university are advanced.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-02-05
Primary Topic
Superconducting and THz Device Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leading up perspectives of the heads of departments and schools on their interactions with hierarchy in UK universities.pdf

Figshare
Superconducting and THz Device Technology
article

Leading up perspectives of the heads of departments and schools on their interactions with hierarchy in UK universities.pdf

article en

Abstract

<p dir="ltr">This study explores the locale of cross-level leadership interactions in universities, where leaders who lead academic units, departments or schools interact with institutional-level leaders. Drawing on interviews with heads of academic units in UK universities, the five-dimensional model of leadership practice was adopted as a framework to analyse the personal, social, structural, and contextual factors that impact the quality and outcome of hierarchical interactions for the unit head. The findings illustrate the heterogeneity of middle leadership experiences due to the manifold factors that influence interactional dynamics and impact practices in situ. A greater concern about responsiveness in university leadership is highlighted because of the embedded nature of middle leadership practices. Concurrently, by providing insights into the areas of interactional tensions for the middle leaders, potential avenues for enhancing leadership responsiveness in the university are advanced.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Superconducting and THz Device Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.