Investigating the effectiveness of Data Augmentation and Contrastive Learning for Named Entity Recognition

Data Augmentation (DA) and Contrastive Learning (CL) are widely used in NLP, but their potential for NER has not yet been investigated in detail. Existing work is mostly limited to zero- and few-shot scenarios where improvements over the baseline are easy to obtain. In this paper, we address this research gap by presenting a systematic evaluation of DA for NER on small, medium-sized and large datasets with coarse and fine-grained labels. We report results for a) DA only, b) DA in combination with supervised contrastive learning, and c) DA with transfer learning. Our results show that DA on its own fails to improve results over the baseline and that supervised CL works better on larger datasets while transfer learning is beneficial if the target dataset is very small. Finally, we investigate how contrastive learning affects the learned representations, based on dimensionality reduction and visualisation techniques, and show that CL mostly helps to separate named entities from non-entities.

Publication Details

Journal
DSpace repository (University of Tartu)
Published
2025-02-17
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the effectiveness of Data Augmentation and Contrastive Learning for Named Entity Recognition

DSpace repository (University of Tartu)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Investigating the effectiveness of Data Augmentation and Contrastive Learning for Named Entity Recognition

article en

Abstract

Data Augmentation (DA) and Contrastive Learning (CL) are widely used in NLP, but their potential for NER has not yet been investigated in detail. Existing work is mostly limited to zero- and few-shot scenarios where improvements over the baseline are easy to obtain. In this paper, we address this research gap by presenting a systematic evaluation of DA for NER on small, medium-sized and large datasets with coarse and fine-grained labels. We report results for a) DA only, b) DA in combination with supervised contrastive learning, and c) DA with transfer learning. Our results show that DA on its own fails to improve results over the baseline and that supervised CL works better on larger datasets while transfer learning is beneficial if the target dataset is very small. Finally, we investigate how contrastive learning affects the learned representations, based on dimensionality reduction and visualisation techniques, and show that CL mostly helps to separate named entities from non-entities.

DSpace repository (University of Tartu)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.