Interpretable deep learning for advancing precision oncology

The goal of precision oncology is to provide each patient with the most appropriate cancer treatment. This approach involves understanding the impact of genomics on individual cancer cases and utilizing this understanding to tailor cancer therapies targeting the genetic mutations that drive the malignancy. Achieving this level of personalization in cancer treatment can be realized by integrating artificial intelligence (AI) to predict how a patient's cancer cells will react to anticancer medications based on their genomic data. Three deep learning methods were developed for drug sensitivity prediction: 1) We used graph-regularized matrix factorization to decompose the drug response matrix into vectors for cell lines and drugs and developed mapping functions to convert observed molecular characteristics into these vectors. 2) A model was created to learn a mapping function from Somatic Genetic Alterations (SGAs) to gene expression. The hidden representations between these observed datasets served as the features of cell line to predict drug response. 3) An extended version of the Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model was utilized to condense gene expression and SGAs data into a low-dimensional, informative representation of cell lines. These representations were subsequently used for predicting drug sensitivity, replacing the raw omics data. While all three models leverage representation learning for cell lines and subsequently apply the representation for drug sensitivity prediction, notable differences distinguish them. The first model excels in prediction performance, accurately forecasting drug responses for unseen drugs and cell lines. However, it falls short in terms of interpretability, which refers to how easily humans can understand its decisions. It involves the transparency of the model's internal workings, making clear how it processes input data to produce output. Conversely, the second model, though interpretable, falls short in performance due to its reliance on SGAs for predicting drug responses. To achieve a balance between predictive efficacy and interpretability, we developed the third model which takes gene expression and SGAs as input, utilizing a Deep Generative Model (DGM) and self-attention mechanism to enhance interpretability. All these three approaches contribute to the broader evolution of cancer medicine by aligning predictive accuracy with interpretive insights.

Publication Details

Journal
D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Published
2024-08-29
Primary Topic
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpretable deep learning for advancing precision oncology

D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
article

Interpretable deep learning for advancing precision oncology

article en

Abstract

The goal of precision oncology is to provide each patient with the most appropriate cancer treatment. This approach involves understanding the impact of genomics on individual cancer cases and utilizing this understanding to tailor cancer therapies targeting the genetic mutations that drive the malignancy. Achieving this level of personalization in cancer treatment can be realized by integrating artificial intelligence (AI) to predict how a patient's cancer cells will react to anticancer medications based on their genomic data. Three deep learning methods were developed for drug sensitivity prediction: 1) We used graph-regularized matrix factorization to decompose the drug response matrix into vectors for cell lines and drugs and developed mapping functions to convert observed molecular characteristics into these vectors. 2) A model was created to learn a mapping function from Somatic Genetic Alterations (SGAs) to gene expression. The hidden representations between these observed datasets served as the features of cell line to predict drug response. 3) An extended version of the Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model was utilized to condense gene expression and SGAs data into a low-dimensional, informative representation of cell lines. These representations were subsequently used for predicting drug sensitivity, replacing the raw omics data. While all three models leverage representation learning for cell lines and subsequently apply the representation for drug sensitivity prediction, notable differences distinguish them. The first model excels in prediction performance, accurately forecasting drug responses for unseen drugs and cell lines. However, it falls short in terms of interpretability, which refers to how easily humans can understand its decisions. It involves the transparency of the model's internal workings, making clear how it processes input data to produce output. Conversely, the second model, though interpretable, falls short in performance due to its reliance on SGAs for predicting drug responses. To achieve a balance between predictive efficacy and interpretability, we developed the third model which takes gene expression and SGAs as input, utilizing a Deep Generative Model (DGM) and self-attention mechanism to enhance interpretability. All these three approaches contribute to the broader evolution of cancer medicine by aligning predictive accuracy with interpretive insights.

D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interpretable deep learning for advancing precision oncology · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS