Effectiveness of psychological therapies for depression and anxiety in atypical dementia

INTRODUCTION: People with dementia may benefit from psychological therapies for depression or anxiety, but evidence of their effectiveness in atypical dementia is limited. METHODS: Using electronic health-care records of > 2 million people who attended psychological therapy services in England between 2012 and 2019, we examined pre–post therapy symptom changes and compared therapy outcomes among 523 people with atypical dementia, a matched cohort without dementia, and 1157 people with typical dementia. RESULTS: People with atypical dementia experienced reductions in depression (Cohen d = −0.92 [−1.05 to −0.79]) and anxiety (d = −0.85 [−0.98 to −0.73]) symptoms. They had similar odds of improvement than people with typical dementia (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85 to 1.34), but lower odds than people living without dementia (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.91). Reasons for discharge were similar between all groups. DISCUSSION: People with atypical dementia may benefit from primary care psychological therapies, but further research is needed to explore necessary adaptations. Highlights: Talking therapies for depression and anxiety may be beneficial for people with atypical dementia. Being younger and having a lower socioeconomic background are associated with poorer outcomes. Receiving more treatment sessions and shorter waiting times are associated with better outcomes.

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of psychological therapies for depression and anxiety in atypical dementia

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Effectiveness of psychological therapies for depression and anxiety in atypical dementia

article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: People with dementia may benefit from psychological therapies for depression or anxiety, but evidence of their effectiveness in atypical dementia is limited. METHODS: Using electronic health-care records of > 2 million people who attended psychological therapy services in England between 2012 and 2019, we examined pre–post therapy symptom changes and compared therapy outcomes among 523 people with atypical dementia, a matched cohort without dementia, and 1157 people with typical dementia. RESULTS: People with atypical dementia experienced reductions in depression (Cohen d = −0.92 [−1.05 to −0.79]) and anxiety (d = −0.85 [−0.98 to −0.73]) symptoms. They had similar odds of improvement than people with typical dementia (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85 to 1.34), but lower odds than people living without dementia (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.91). Reasons for discharge were similar between all groups. DISCUSSION: People with atypical dementia may benefit from primary care psychological therapies, but further research is needed to explore necessary adaptations. Highlights: Talking therapies for depression and anxiety may be beneficial for people with atypical dementia. Being younger and having a lower socioeconomic background are associated with poorer outcomes. Receiving more treatment sessions and shorter waiting times are associated with better outcomes.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Alzheimer's Society, National Institute for Health and Care Research, University College London, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Medical Research Council, Programme Grants for Applied Research
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.