Ethical Limitations of Using AI to Predict and Diagnose Mental Health Disorders Based on Individuals’ Social Media Activity

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is developed with predictive tools and is used to predict and diagnose mental health disorders based on data mined on social media platforms. Despite the growth of its adoption, there is limited literature that explicitly states the ethical limits of this technology within the context of predictive mental health assessment. This study adopts a qualitative and deductive approach, it adopts the socio-technical systems theory which is evaluated using a systematic literature review approach focused on a data set of 40 documents. The results indicate that there are no clear regulations that define how much and what type of data social networking companies can collect for mental health assessments. They often act outside any formal ethical governance regulations that are typically imposed on medical professionals. Diagnosing mental health disorders without informed consent, violating privacy through data sharing, lack of transparency and accountability, and limited training data scope, emerged as the key ethical limitations. The exploration of various ethical issues provided insight into the responsible and effective use of this technology in mental health care.

Publication Details

Journal
DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University)
Published
2024-09-12
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Limitations of Using AI to Predict and Diagnose Mental Health Disorders Based on Individuals’ Social Media Activity

DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Ethical Limitations of Using AI to Predict and Diagnose Mental Health Disorders Based on Individuals’ Social Media Activity

article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is developed with predictive tools and is used to predict and diagnose mental health disorders based on data mined on social media platforms. Despite the growth of its adoption, there is limited literature that explicitly states the ethical limits of this technology within the context of predictive mental health assessment. This study adopts a qualitative and deductive approach, it adopts the socio-technical systems theory which is evaluated using a systematic literature review approach focused on a data set of 40 documents. The results indicate that there are no clear regulations that define how much and what type of data social networking companies can collect for mental health assessments. They often act outside any formal ethical governance regulations that are typically imposed on medical professionals. Diagnosing mental health disorders without informed consent, violating privacy through data sharing, lack of transparency and accountability, and limited training data scope, emerged as the key ethical limitations. The exploration of various ethical issues provided insight into the responsible and effective use of this technology in mental health care.

DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.