Enhancing or Hindering? The Influence of Generative AI on Critical Thinking and Collaborative Learning

The rise of generative AI tools has introduced new dynamics into university classrooms, particularly in how students collaborate and engage in critical thinking. This study investigates the effects of AI-assisted learning on student collaboration and cognitive engagement within a first-year undergraduate management course. Using an experimental design, we compared traditional group case study activities to AI-supported analysis. Results indicate that while AI facilitated faster information retrieval, it corresponded with reduced peer discussion and lower average performance compared to the control group. Post-experiment surveys and classroom observations suggest that AI use shifted student behaviors toward information consumption rather than collaborative knowledge construction. These findings highlight the complex influence of generative AI on foundational learning processes and point to the need for continued research on its long-term impacts in higher education contexts.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing or Hindering? The Influence of Generative AI on Critical Thinking and Collaborative Learning

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Enhancing or Hindering? The Influence of Generative AI on Critical Thinking and Collaborative Learning

article en

Abstract

The rise of generative AI tools has introduced new dynamics into university classrooms, particularly in how students collaborate and engage in critical thinking. This study investigates the effects of AI-assisted learning on student collaboration and cognitive engagement within a first-year undergraduate management course. Using an experimental design, we compared traditional group case study activities to AI-supported analysis. Results indicate that while AI facilitated faster information retrieval, it corresponded with reduced peer discussion and lower average performance compared to the control group. Post-experiment surveys and classroom observations suggest that AI use shifted student behaviors toward information consumption rather than collaborative knowledge construction. These findings highlight the complex influence of generative AI on foundational learning processes and point to the need for continued research on its long-term impacts in higher education contexts.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
University of Toronto, University of Toronto Mississauga
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.