Dismantling Sex as an Institution of Power: A Trans-Informed Critique of the Regulatory Power of Sex in Canadian Law and Society

Through an analysis of Canadian court decisions, tribunal decisions, and correctional policies, this dissertation explores some of the barriers to the ideals of gender self-determination. While existing research highlights the limitations of legal human rights frameworks in addressing the material and structural inequalities faced by trans and gender nonconforming people, more research is needed to interrogate the social, cultural, and legal mechanisms that regulate and erase trans identities. This dissertation addresses this critical gap in the Canadian context. Drawing on insights from critical queer, intersectional feminist, and trans scholarship, this dissertation builds on Foucault’s (1981) concept of institutions of power and introduces the novel theoretical framework of sex as an institution of power. I argue that sex as an institution of power represents the underpinning foundation through which biological essentialism and cisnormativity gain their regulatory power. By reconceptualizing sex as a powerful institution of the state and a decentralized authority, this dissertation offers new insights into how sex and sex-based distinctions are culturally and legally validated, while gender identity and expression are dismissed as secondary constructs. Following an integrated-article dissertation format, three discrete yet related studies critique the regulatory power of sex across various legal and administrative domains—most prominently human rights and corrections. Building dialogically upon one another, these studies reveal the underlying rationales through which decision-makers and everyday individuals actively obstruct gender self-determination. By clarifying and critiquing many of the nebulous claims surrounding gender nonconformity, this dissertation offers critical contributions to the growing body of scholarship and activism advocating for transformative social change—not only in law, but in our everyday lives.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Published
2025-04-23
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dismantling Sex as an Institution of Power: A Trans-Informed Critique of the Regulatory Power of Sex in Canadian Law and Society

Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Dismantling Sex as an Institution of Power: A Trans-Informed Critique of the Regulatory Power of Sex in Canadian Law and Society

article en

Abstract

Through an analysis of Canadian court decisions, tribunal decisions, and correctional policies, this dissertation explores some of the barriers to the ideals of gender self-determination. While existing research highlights the limitations of legal human rights frameworks in addressing the material and structural inequalities faced by trans and gender nonconforming people, more research is needed to interrogate the social, cultural, and legal mechanisms that regulate and erase trans identities. This dissertation addresses this critical gap in the Canadian context. Drawing on insights from critical queer, intersectional feminist, and trans scholarship, this dissertation builds on Foucault’s (1981) concept of institutions of power and introduces the novel theoretical framework of sex as an institution of power. I argue that sex as an institution of power represents the underpinning foundation through which biological essentialism and cisnormativity gain their regulatory power. By reconceptualizing sex as a powerful institution of the state and a decentralized authority, this dissertation offers new insights into how sex and sex-based distinctions are culturally and legally validated, while gender identity and expression are dismissed as secondary constructs. Following an integrated-article dissertation format, three discrete yet related studies critique the regulatory power of sex across various legal and administrative domains—most prominently human rights and corrections. Building dialogically upon one another, these studies reveal the underlying rationales through which decision-makers and everyday individuals actively obstruct gender self-determination. By clarifying and critiquing many of the nebulous claims surrounding gender nonconformity, this dissertation offers critical contributions to the growing body of scholarship and activism advocating for transformative social change—not only in law, but in our everyday lives.

Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dismantling Sex as an Institution of Power: A Trans-Informed Critique of the Regulatory Power of Sex in Canadian Law and Society · Scholarship@Western (Western University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS