Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Managing Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) in USA: Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) vs Standard of Care (SoC)

Salvatore Russo,1 Stefano Landi,2 Stefania Simoni3 1Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy; 2Department of Management, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 3Department of Law studies, University of Salento, Lecce, ItalyCorrespondence: Stefania Simoni, University of Salento, Piazza Tancredi, n. 7, Lecce, 73100, Italy, Tel +393495748429, Email [email protected]: Chronic skin ulcers in diabetic foot patients are a significant health concern. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) significantly threaten the health and longevity of individuals with diabetes, leading to severe complications like infection and amputation and contributing to high morbidity and mortality rates. Given the severe implications, practical strategies to prevent and manage DFUs are crucial to reducing amputation rates. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a popular treatment option due to its properties that mimic the body’s natural healing process. The objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PRPR vs standard of care in US context.Methods: Decision analytical model was used to synthesize clinical and economic parameters. In detail a CEA analysis was employed using a Markov decision-making model to evaluate patients with chronic DFUs lasting over three weeks and at high risk for orthopedic complications. The study assessed the effectiveness of different treatments, measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and reported costs in 2023 dollars using a micro-costing approach alongside a clinical trial.Results: The study concluded that PRP gel is a cost-effective treatment for non-healing DFUs, resulting in lower care costs over one year compared to other treatments and cost savings over five years.Conclusion: Thus, PRP treatment is a promising and practical option, improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. It is an attractive choice for healthcare providers and insurers in managing non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.Keywords: cost-effectiveness analysis, wound management, platelet-rich plasma, DFUs, diabetic foot ulcer, Ulcer

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Managing Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) in USA: Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) vs Standard of Care (SoC)

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Managing Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) in USA: Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) vs Standard of Care (SoC)

article en

Abstract

Salvatore Russo,1 Stefano Landi,2 Stefania Simoni3 1Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy; 2Department of Management, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 3Department of Law studies, University of Salento, Lecce, ItalyCorrespondence: Stefania Simoni, University of Salento, Piazza Tancredi, n. 7, Lecce, 73100, Italy, Tel +393495748429, Email [email protected]: Chronic skin ulcers in diabetic foot patients are a significant health concern. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) significantly threaten the health and longevity of individuals with diabetes, leading to severe complications like infection and amputation and contributing to high morbidity and mortality rates. Given the severe implications, practical strategies to prevent and manage DFUs are crucial to reducing amputation rates. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a popular treatment option due to its properties that mimic the body’s natural healing process. The objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PRPR vs standard of care in US context.Methods: Decision analytical model was used to synthesize clinical and economic parameters. In detail a CEA analysis was employed using a Markov decision-making model to evaluate patients with chronic DFUs lasting over three weeks and at high risk for orthopedic complications. The study assessed the effectiveness of different treatments, measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and reported costs in 2023 dollars using a micro-costing approach alongside a clinical trial.Results: The study concluded that PRP gel is a cost-effective treatment for non-healing DFUs, resulting in lower care costs over one year compared to other treatments and cost savings over five years.Conclusion: Thus, PRP treatment is a promising and practical option, improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. It is an attractive choice for healthcare providers and insurers in managing non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.Keywords: cost-effectiveness analysis, wound management, platelet-rich plasma, DFUs, diabetic foot ulcer, Ulcer

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.