From Deliberate Indifference to Civil Negligence: Protecting Male Prisoners from Sexual Violence in United States Prisons

Sexual violence in United States prisons is a pervasive issue that disproportionately impacts male inmates, revealing systemic failures in the current legal framework designed to protect incarcerated individuals. The deliberate indifference standard, established by the United States Supreme Court, imposes an excessively high burden of proof on survivors, requiring evidence of prison officials’ subjective awareness of specific, substantial risks. This article critiques the shortcomings of the deliberate indifference standard and proposes a civil negligence framework as a promising alternative. Grounded in an objective duty of care, a civil negligence approach emphasizes proactive measures that institutions must take to avoid liability. By shifting accountability to systemic responsibility, the civil negligence framework ensures justice for male survivors, promotes humane treatment and addresses the systemic neglect to preserve inmates’ dignity and human rights.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-03-03
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Deliberate Indifference to Civil Negligence: Protecting Male Prisoners from Sexual Violence in United States Prisons

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

From Deliberate Indifference to Civil Negligence: Protecting Male Prisoners from Sexual Violence in United States Prisons

article en

Abstract

Sexual violence in United States prisons is a pervasive issue that disproportionately impacts male inmates, revealing systemic failures in the current legal framework designed to protect incarcerated individuals. The deliberate indifference standard, established by the United States Supreme Court, imposes an excessively high burden of proof on survivors, requiring evidence of prison officials’ subjective awareness of specific, substantial risks. This article critiques the shortcomings of the deliberate indifference standard and proposes a civil negligence framework as a promising alternative. Grounded in an objective duty of care, a civil negligence approach emphasizes proactive measures that institutions must take to avoid liability. By shifting accountability to systemic responsibility, the civil negligence framework ensures justice for male survivors, promotes humane treatment and addresses the systemic neglect to preserve inmates’ dignity and human rights.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.