Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Lesion Resection and Posterior Lesion Debridement, Bone Grafting, Fusion and Internal Fixation Combined With Medication in the Treatment of Lumbar Brucellosis Spondylitis

Alimujiang Yusufu,1,2,&ast; Abuduwupuer Haibier,1,2,&ast; Yuan Ma1 1Department of Spine Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopaedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, People’s Republic of China; 2Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yuan Ma, Email [email protected]: This study intends to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic lumbar brucellosis with traditional posterior focus debridement, bone grafting, fusion and internal fixation combined with drugs in the treatment of lumbar brucellosis, and summarize the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical methods, in order to provide theoretical support for clinical surgical decision-making.Methods: The data of 41 lumbar brucellosis patients admitted to the Department of spinal Surgery of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2018 to June 2023 were divided into endoscopic group (Group A, n = 15) and open surgery group (Group B, n = 26). Two groups of general data, surgical and related indicators, blood biochemical and imaging indicators were recorded and analyzed, and the clinical recovery and complications were evaluated according to various scores.Results: There was no statistical difference in baseline data between Group A and Group B, and it could be compared between the two groups; the postoperative lumbar VAS score and hemoglobin index of Group A were significantly better than that of Group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05); Group A was significantly better than Group B in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative time to go down, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups in other indicators (P> 0.05).Conclusion: The two types of lumbar brucellosis treatment are safe and effective, and the clinical effect of endoscopic surgery is outstanding, which is more conducive to the postoperative rehabilitation of patients. It is recommended when conditions permit.Keywords: lumbar brucellosis spondylitis, LBS, lumbar, lesion removal, endoscopic, posterior surgery

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Lesion Resection and Posterior Lesion Debridement, Bone Grafting, Fusion and Internal Fixation Combined With Medication in the Treatment of Lumbar Brucellosis Spondylitis

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Lesion Resection and Posterior Lesion Debridement, Bone Grafting, Fusion and Internal Fixation Combined With Medication in the Treatment of Lumbar Brucellosis Spondylitis

article en

Abstract

Alimujiang Yusufu,1,2,&ast; Abuduwupuer Haibier,1,2,&ast; Yuan Ma1 1Department of Spine Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopaedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, People’s Republic of China; 2Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yuan Ma, Email [email protected]: This study intends to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic lumbar brucellosis with traditional posterior focus debridement, bone grafting, fusion and internal fixation combined with drugs in the treatment of lumbar brucellosis, and summarize the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical methods, in order to provide theoretical support for clinical surgical decision-making.Methods: The data of 41 lumbar brucellosis patients admitted to the Department of spinal Surgery of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2018 to June 2023 were divided into endoscopic group (Group A, n = 15) and open surgery group (Group B, n = 26). Two groups of general data, surgical and related indicators, blood biochemical and imaging indicators were recorded and analyzed, and the clinical recovery and complications were evaluated according to various scores.Results: There was no statistical difference in baseline data between Group A and Group B, and it could be compared between the two groups; the postoperative lumbar VAS score and hemoglobin index of Group A were significantly better than that of Group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05); Group A was significantly better than Group B in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative time to go down, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups in other indicators (P> 0.05).Conclusion: The two types of lumbar brucellosis treatment are safe and effective, and the clinical effect of endoscopic surgery is outstanding, which is more conducive to the postoperative rehabilitation of patients. It is recommended when conditions permit.Keywords: lumbar brucellosis spondylitis, LBS, lumbar, lesion removal, endoscopic, posterior surgery

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.