Breaking Down the Barriers: Why Digital Platforms Aren’t Thriving in Healthcare

In the rapidly evolving domain of digital entrepreneurship, understanding the multifaceted causes of platform venture failures is crucial. This paper investigates the developmental trajectories of two early-stage German platform ventures in the healthcare sector over a two-year period, employing an ethnographic approach. We conceptualize failure into four distinct types: target (misaligned objectives), technical (technological shortcomings), venture (operational deficiencies), and policy (regulatory barriers). Each category provides insights into the complexities of navigating the challenges, which are decisive for the success of platform ventures in a highly regulated setting. Our preliminary results emphasize the multiple interdependencies between different failure types, with type I and type II failures – while being individually manageable – collectively escalating to type III failures. This is further complicated by ineffective policies (type IV). By conceptualizing failure, our research not only enriches the existing IS literature but also provides valuable insights into the underlying reasons why digital platforms are rarely found in the healthcare sector.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking Down the Barriers: Why Digital Platforms Aren’t Thriving in Healthcare

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Breaking Down the Barriers: Why Digital Platforms Aren’t Thriving in Healthcare

article en

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving domain of digital entrepreneurship, understanding the multifaceted causes of platform venture failures is crucial. This paper investigates the developmental trajectories of two early-stage German platform ventures in the healthcare sector over a two-year period, employing an ethnographic approach. We conceptualize failure into four distinct types: target (misaligned objectives), technical (technological shortcomings), venture (operational deficiencies), and policy (regulatory barriers). Each category provides insights into the complexities of navigating the challenges, which are decisive for the success of platform ventures in a highly regulated setting. Our preliminary results emphasize the multiple interdependencies between different failure types, with type I and type II failures – while being individually manageable – collectively escalating to type III failures. This is further complicated by ineffective policies (type IV). By conceptualizing failure, our research not only enriches the existing IS literature but also provides valuable insights into the underlying reasons why digital platforms are rarely found in the healthcare sector.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.