A Broken Record: A Statutory Solution to Fixing Music Copyright Infringement’s Biggest Problem

In the intellectual property space, nothing quite grabs the eye of the public like music copyright infringement. The high reputational and monetary risks associated when an artist claims infringement— especially against that of a major artist—can have huge consequences, even when no infringement occurred. The two prevailing tests for copyright infringement recognize that the hearing court can determine there is not an appropriate level of substantial similarity between two copyrightable works, however this determination relies on specialized musical knowledge, something that the typical trial judge does not possess. This Note examines the inefficiencies in our current scheme of music copyright infringement litigation and suggests a statutory change requiring a board of musicologists to determine whether there are any extrinsic similarities prior to the filing of a complaint. Such a change would prevent frivolous litigation, create more certainty as to what could constitute an infringement, and further the goals of copyright law.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-04-17
Primary Topic
Legal and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Broken Record: A Statutory Solution to Fixing Music Copyright Infringement’s Biggest Problem

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Legal and Constitutional Studies
article

A Broken Record: A Statutory Solution to Fixing Music Copyright Infringement’s Biggest Problem

article en

Abstract

In the intellectual property space, nothing quite grabs the eye of the public like music copyright infringement. The high reputational and monetary risks associated when an artist claims infringement— especially against that of a major artist—can have huge consequences, even when no infringement occurred. The two prevailing tests for copyright infringement recognize that the hearing court can determine there is not an appropriate level of substantial similarity between two copyrightable works, however this determination relies on specialized musical knowledge, something that the typical trial judge does not possess. This Note examines the inefficiencies in our current scheme of music copyright infringement litigation and suggests a statutory change requiring a board of musicologists to determine whether there are any extrinsic similarities prior to the filing of a complaint. Such a change would prevent frivolous litigation, create more certainty as to what could constitute an infringement, and further the goals of copyright law.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Legal and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.