Associations Between Serum and Skeletal Muscle Androgens and Androgen Receptor-associated Biomarkers, Lean Body Mass, and Muscular Strength

The relationships between lean body mass (LBM), muscular strength, androgens, and several androgen receptor (AR)-associated biomarkers are sparsely described. PURPOSE: To examine any potential correlations linking these aforementioned factors. METHODS: 10 resistance-trained males were recruited for this crossover study, each assessing their leg and bench press one-repetition maximums (1RM) and body composition before completing two volume- and intensity-equated resistance training sessions separated by 7-10 days. Serum and skeletal muscle tissue samples were acquired in each session at baseline, 3-hours, and 24-hours post-exercise to assess circulating and muscle androgens (testosterone [TST] and dihydrotestosterone [DHT]), AR protein content and gene expression, as well as AR-DNA binding levels. Pearson correlation coefficients were employed to evaluate the intersectional relationships between LBM, 1RM assessments, androgens ([serum free and total] TST and muscle DHT), AR-associated biomarkers (AR protein, AR mRNA relative fold changes, and AR-DNA binding), whereby all previously mentioned analyses were performed at p<.05. RESULTS: Analyses detected several statistically significant correlations, all of which were positively associated. Specifically, LBM was significantly associated with leg press (p=.015; R=.705) and bench press (p=.048; R=.607) 1RM. Leg press 1RM was also significantly correlated to serum total TST (p=.012; R=.909), whereby serum total TST was further associated with serum free TST (p=.030; R=.339). Serum free TST was also significantly correlated with AR mRNA relative fold changes (p=.001; R=.392) and AR-DNA binding (p=.021; R=.287). Finally, muscle DHT was significantly correlated to muscle TST (p.<001; R=.415) and AR protein (p<.001; R=.421). CONCLUSION: These data corroborate the well-established relationships between LBM and strength, additionally providing insight into how these factors are influenced by serum and skeletal muscle androgens, as well as other androgen-receptor-associated biomarkers. Future research should explore the intersectional viability connecting muscular hypertrophy and performance to statistically significant relationships such as AR-DNA binding-serum free TST, serum free TST-leg press, and leg press-LBM.

Publication Details

Journal
TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Published
2024-11-06
Primary Topic
Waste Management and Recycling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations Between Serum and Skeletal Muscle Androgens and Androgen Receptor-associated Biomarkers, Lean Body Mass, and Muscular Strength

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Waste Management and Recycling
article

Associations Between Serum and Skeletal Muscle Androgens and Androgen Receptor-associated Biomarkers, Lean Body Mass, and Muscular Strength

article en

Abstract

The relationships between lean body mass (LBM), muscular strength, androgens, and several androgen receptor (AR)-associated biomarkers are sparsely described. PURPOSE: To examine any potential correlations linking these aforementioned factors. METHODS: 10 resistance-trained males were recruited for this crossover study, each assessing their leg and bench press one-repetition maximums (1RM) and body composition before completing two volume- and intensity-equated resistance training sessions separated by 7-10 days. Serum and skeletal muscle tissue samples were acquired in each session at baseline, 3-hours, and 24-hours post-exercise to assess circulating and muscle androgens (testosterone [TST] and dihydrotestosterone [DHT]), AR protein content and gene expression, as well as AR-DNA binding levels. Pearson correlation coefficients were employed to evaluate the intersectional relationships between LBM, 1RM assessments, androgens ([serum free and total] TST and muscle DHT), AR-associated biomarkers (AR protein, AR mRNA relative fold changes, and AR-DNA binding), whereby all previously mentioned analyses were performed at p<.05. RESULTS: Analyses detected several statistically significant correlations, all of which were positively associated. Specifically, LBM was significantly associated with leg press (p=.015; R=.705) and bench press (p=.048; R=.607) 1RM. Leg press 1RM was also significantly correlated to serum total TST (p=.012; R=.909), whereby serum total TST was further associated with serum free TST (p=.030; R=.339). Serum free TST was also significantly correlated with AR mRNA relative fold changes (p=.001; R=.392) and AR-DNA binding (p=.021; R=.287). Finally, muscle DHT was significantly correlated to muscle TST (p.<001; R=.415) and AR protein (p<.001; R=.421). CONCLUSION: These data corroborate the well-established relationships between LBM and strength, additionally providing insight into how these factors are influenced by serum and skeletal muscle androgens, as well as other androgen-receptor-associated biomarkers. Future research should explore the intersectional viability connecting muscular hypertrophy and performance to statistically significant relationships such as AR-DNA binding-serum free TST, serum free TST-leg press, and leg press-LBM.

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Waste Management and Recycling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Associations Between Serum and Skeletal Muscle Androgens and Androgen Receptor-associated Biomarkers, Lean Body Mass, and Muscular Strength · TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS