Are Returns to R&D in the Global Services Industry Impervious to Business Environment Turbulence?

We investigate firm, industry and country variations in changes of returns to R&D after the global financial crisis in the global services industry. To conduct this exploratory work, we use a large panel data sample of 11,635 company-years from 82 countries for the period 2003-2013. We find that services firms, after the crisis, could derive better returns from R&D, and that the changing returns to R&D may be contingent on firm-specific idiosyncrasies, general industrial environments, and national institutional quality. Our results find support in both the exogenous shock model and Schumpeterian theories, but only to an extent, thus demonstrating the need for further theorization on the influence of R&D on a firm's performance in the post-crisis period. We address the question of whether returns to R&D in the services industry are impervious to business environment turbulence. We find that they are not, though persistence in R&D, contingent on the firm, industry, and country-level factors, could be crucial for their performance. Notably, low market share, high leverage, stability in the services subindustries, and sound national institutional quality might be important to derive returns frominnovative activities.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-02
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Returns to R&D in the Global Services Industry Impervious to Business Environment Turbulence?

1 citations
Figshare
Firm Innovation and Growth
1.13
article

Are Returns to R&D in the Global Services Industry Impervious to Business Environment Turbulence?

article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigate firm, industry and country variations in changes of returns to R&D after the global financial crisis in the global services industry. To conduct this exploratory work, we use a large panel data sample of 11,635 company-years from 82 countries for the period 2003-2013. We find that services firms, after the crisis, could derive better returns from R&D, and that the changing returns to R&D may be contingent on firm-specific idiosyncrasies, general industrial environments, and national institutional quality. Our results find support in both the exogenous shock model and Schumpeterian theories, but only to an extent, thus demonstrating the need for further theorization on the influence of R&D on a firm's performance in the post-crisis period. We address the question of whether returns to R&D in the services industry are impervious to business environment turbulence. We find that they are not, though persistence in R&D, contingent on the firm, industry, and country-level factors, could be crucial for their performance. Notably, low market share, high leverage, stability in the services subindustries, and sound national institutional quality might be important to derive returns frominnovative activities.

Figshare
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Firm Innovation and Growth
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.